Search This Blog

Monday, February 03, 2014

007 Feature #5 - "GoldenEye" featuring Brosnan...Pierce Brosnan

This is going to be a huge challenge for me to write this blog entry today because as I type this entry out, I am battling the dreaded stomach flu.  It came on all of a sudden too, which stunned even me.

But I suppose that it couldn't be helped.  The flu is going around a lot where I live.  I suppose that it was only inevitable for me to catch it.  And, while I won't go into detail over how badly I feel, I'll just say that having the flu is by no means glamourous.

So, I hope you'll understand why I probably won't be making this blog entry as jam-packed full of trivia information as previous entries.  My hope is that next week, I'll be recovered enough to end this special series of James Bond themed entries with a bang.



What, you think a little thing like a gastrointestinal bug is going to stop me from writing an entry?  Of course not!  This is week #5 in a six-week look back at all things Bond.  Each week, I've been taking a look at one of the Bonds, as well as what I think was their best movie.  For the list up to this point, here's links to the other postings.

007 Feature #1 - Dr. No featuring Connery...Sean Connery


And, for this week's edition, the Bond that is the subject of mixed opinion.  Some absolutely love him, others can't stand him.  My own opinion of Bond #5 is exactly the same as Bond #3.  I loved his earlier movies, but didn't care for his later ones.  Not that any of the movies that he did were horrible.  I didn't mind three of the four of them.  But when it came to choosing the film that I would spotlight featuring Bond #5, I tended to go for one of his earliest ones.

And what's interesting about Bond #5 was that he was actually supposed to be Bond #4, but due to NBC deciding to keep him on contract to "Remington Steele", he ended up losing the gig to Timothy Dalton in 1986.



Nine years later though, Pierce Brosnan would come to have a second chance to play Bond.  And beginning in 1995, Pierce Brosnan became the fifth actor to play the role of James Bond after Timothy Dalton resigned from the role one year earlier.

And the story behind the departure of Dalton is almost as interesting as Brosnan being given the part.  You see, Timothy Dalton was actually committed to three films in his contract.  We already know that two of those movies were "The Living Daylights" and "Licence To Kill".  It was widely considered that Dalton would honour his third film commitment shortly after "Licence To Kill" wrapped up, and the third film project would be released sometime in 1991.

Unfortunately, neither Dalton nor the Albert R. Broccoli were prepared for the events that lead to Dalton resigning.  Because "Licence To Kill" was the lowest grossing Bond film in America, people began to speculate that the film franchise was in trouble.  To add to the drama, MGM/UA (the company that sponsored and distributed the Bond series) was sold to an Australian broadcasting group known as Qintex - at which point, Qintex would merge with French production company Pathe.  Meanwhile, Danjaq - the parent company of Eon Productions had launched a lawsuit against MGM/UA because the Bond back catalogue had been licensed to Pathe, which planned on broadcasting the entire Bond series on television around the world without Danjaq's approval. 

Because of these legal disputes, Dalton's contract was left in limbo, and the film release date was pushed back from 1991 to 1994!  Although the screenplay had been completed for the film by Michael France, the waiting proved to be too much for Dalton's patience, and he resigned from the series in April 1994. 

So, with a new Bond being required to finish the film, the choice was really a no-brainer.  Since Brosnan had already been promised the role in 1986 (before the "Remington Steele" debacle), it was decided that he would take over the Bond franchise, which he did from 1995 until 2002.

Now, here comes the tricky part.  Brosnan did four films in the series.  Which one would I feature?

Well, as I stated before hand, I liked Brosnan's early films, but not so much the later ones.  1999's "The World Is Not Enough" was okay, but I never did like Denise Richards as a Bond girl for whatever reason.  Nothing against her acting ability, but perhaps my opinion may have been clouded by the fact that Richards once played a girl who had a crush on Slater in "Saved By The Bell".  And 2002's "Die Another Day" relied too much on CGI animation to really tell a coherent story - although Rosamund Pike's portrayal of Miranda Frost was excellent, and I didn't mind Halle Berry as Jinx either - though Madonna should probably never do another Bond theme again.

So, we're left with 1995's "GoldenEye" and 1997's "Tomorrow Never Dies".  Both films are quite excellent, and in my Top 10 list of Bond films, both of these are in that list.  But as good a movie as "Tomorrow Never Dies" really was, I decided to go with "GoldenEye" as the subject of discussion for three reasons.



First, the theme song is wickedly cool.  Tina Turner singing a song written by Bono and The Edge from U2?  Pure awesomeness.  And whoever did the title design for these opening credits was a genius.



Secondly, this film actually does a great job incorporating Brosnan into the Bond franchise, and the casting choices were fantastic all around.  Sean Bean, Famke Janssen, Izabella Scorupko, Robbie Coltrane, Alan Cumming, and introducing Dame Judi Dench as the first female "M" was brilliant!

And, thirdly..."GoldenEye" was supposed to be the final film that Dalton would have made had he stayed on with the franchise.  I admit that it would have been interesting to see what might have been had Dalton stayed on.  It might have moved him up a couple of notches on my most liked Bonds.

So, let's talk a bit about the plot (and when I say a bit, I mean the most miniscule details, as I never want to spoil too many details).



Amusingly enough, the film opens up nine years prior to the events that take place in "GoldenEye" in 1986 - the same year that Brosnan got screwed out of playing Bond in the first place.  Initially, Bond is working with another Double-0 Agent - Alec Trevalyan 006 (Bean) to infiltrate a Soviet chemical weapons base and blow it up real good.  But naturally, if the two agents would have succeeded at their task, the movie would have concluded in ten minutes with Pierce Brosnan and Sean Bean playing a round of golf in Hawaii.

Instead what happens is that 006 is shot by Colonel Arkady Ourumov, and 007 manages to escape in a plane while the chemicals plant explodes.

So, from what it appears, it looks like Agent 006 has been killed.  But in a Bond film, nothing ever looks as it appears.  For not only has 006 survived the ordeal - but he has crossed over to the dark side.  And, whereas Bond was once a friend...he is now an enemy.



Flash forward nine years, and Bond is now given a new mission.  Track down Xenia Onatopp (Janssen) and keep an eye on her.  Onatopp is suspected to be a member of the crime syndicate known as Janus - a criminal organization that has committed crimes all over the world over the last eight or nine years (surprise, surprise), and Bond's ultimate mission is to shut the organization down.

Unfortunately, Bond is too late to prevent the group from causing a lot of death and destruction.  After Onatopp kills a Royal Canadian Navy admiral, and Ourumov steals his identity, it allows the group to steal a Eurocopter Tiger helicopter that can withstand electromagnetic pulses - the weapon of choice that they plan on using to steal the control disk for the dual GoldenEye satellite weapons.  They descend on a secret bunker located in Severnaya, and in their quest to gain control of the weapons, kill off most of the scientists and researchers in the complex and manage to recruit programmer Boris Grishenko (Cumming) to their side.



But as it turns out, the attack did leave behind one survivor - Natalya Simonova.  And Simonova teams up with Bond to bring down the Janus syndicate before they can have the opportunity to create more damage.

Now, that's all that I feel compelled to reveal.  If I give out too many plot details, I'll ruin the movie.

But I can offer up some backstage trivia for you in regards to this movie.

01 - Desmond Llewelyn was the only returning face to Bond's team as "Q".  This was Judi Dench's first film as "M", and Samantha Bond's first film as Moneypenny.

02 - This was Albert R. Broccoli's last Bond film in which he was credited as part of the staff (as consulting producer).  He would pass away at the age of 87 on June 27, 1996 - seven months after GoldenEye's November 13, 1995 release date.

03 - The film name "GoldenEye" pays homage to Bond creator Sir Ian Fleming.  One of the operations that he took part in while in service to the British Naval Intelligence was "Operation Goldeneye"!

04 - This movie was the first Bond movie to be released on DVD format.

05 - Famke Janssen performed her own driving stunts in the movie.

06 - The Rolling Stones were offered the chance to record the theme song for this movie, but turned it down.

07 - Some of the close-up shots of Bond's hand were actually that of Brosnan's adopted son, Christopher.  The reason why was because Brosnan had injured his hand quite badly at his home in Malibu.

08 - This film features a bungee cord jump from a structure 722 feet high up - the longest bungee jump ever recorded for a motion picture.  The man who performed the jump later had a cameo in the film as a helicopter pilot.

09 - Look closely at the cards that Xenia is holding in the casino scene with Bond.  Xenia has two face cards and a seven in her hand - or 007, if you like.

10 - This was the first Bond film to have an original screenplay - without any reference to any of Ian Fleming's previous works.

11 - The first Bond movie to use computer generated imagery - the gun barrel opening was completely animated using CGI.

12 - The movie began production in January 1995.  Robbie Coltrane's scenes were the very first to be shot.

13 - Pierce Brosnan is one of only two Bond actors to be born outside of the United Kingdom.  Brosnan grew up in Ireland, and George Lazenby was Australian.

14 - During the fight scene in the sauna, I imagine that it must have been painful for Famke Janssen.  She admitted that she broke a rib filming that scene!

15 - Paulina Porizkova and Eva Herzigova were offered the role of Natalya, but both turned it down.

16 - The first Bond movie to be directed by a non-British director.  In this case, it was directed by New Zealand born Martin Campbell.

17 - "M"'s real name is listed as Barbara Mawdsley.

18 - The alcoholic beverages weren't really alcohol.  The martinis that James Bond drinks were really ice water.  And "M"'s bourbon is really apple juice.

19 - Nails were attached to the tires of the Ferrari F355 for the skid in the car chase with Bond's Aston Martin.  Problem was that the car was rented, and when the car was involved in a collision, it had to be repaired immediately - at a cost of $80,000!

20 - Believe it or not, Sean Bean auditioned for the role of James Bond in 1987's "The Living Daylights"!

21 - This film also marks the film where James Bond kills the most people - with the final death toll being 47!

And, that's our look back at Pierce Brosnan's turn as Bond.  And, while I wasn't a fan of the latter two films he did, I loved the first two.  And, the seventeenth film of the Eon series of Bond films certainly was the best film that showcases Brosnan in the most positive light. 

Next week, the Bond series wraps up with the sixth (and current) Bond - and his turn as the spy shows that sometimes blond Bonds do have more fun!

Sunday, February 02, 2014

Shake It Like A Polaroid Picture!

Hello, everybody, and happy Super Bowl Sunday to all of you reading this!

I know that the big game is today, and I am sure that you are absolutely anxious to find out whether the Seahawks or the Broncos will take home the coveted Super Bowl trophy.

(Or, if you're like me, you're more interested in the halftime show and television commercials - which thanks to Canadian simulcasting we always seem to get gypped out of the latter.)

However, I just want you to take the time to read this Sunday Jukebox entry for today.  It will only take you a few minutes.  After that, you can go ahead and gorge on all the buffalo wings, pepperoni pizza, and pork rinds you desire.

Now, if you've kept up with the Sunday Jukebox entries for this year, you'll know that I am doing things a little bit differently.  This year, every song that is featured will be one that has hit the top of the Billboard charts for at least one week.  Now, this might not seem like much of a challenge.  After all, since the Billboard charts were first implemented in 1940, it's estimated that hundreds, if not thousands of songs have hit #1.

But I'm also going to issue a bit of a challenge to myself when doing this week's blog entry. 

Now, if you were a regular reader of the blog in February 2013, you'll know that I made every entry that month linked to an event known as
BLACK HISTORY MONTH.  It was certainly one of the toughest challenges that I have ever given myself, but very rewarding at the same time.  I ended up learning a lot of information and history with each post - some of which I did not know prior to writing the articles. 

I so wanted to do something similar for this February as well, but I ended up coming to the realization that I used up all of my good topics last year, so I won't be able to devote the whole month to celebrating the accomplishments and achievements of black artists, singers, actors, and trailblazers. 

But, I will be doing a selection of special themed blog topics that will celebrate Black History Month.  Mostly you can find them in the Sunday Jukebox, Friday Night TV Guide, and possibly even the Tuesday Timeline entries.  But again, I could change things up a little bit too, if I so decide.

So, here's my added challenge for today.  Can I choose a #1 song and have it be performed by artists of colour?

Well, the answer of course is yes.  And what better year to visit than ten years ago?

You see, the year 2004 was an unprecedented year in music history.  A total of twelve songs topped the charts in the year 2004, and every single song that hit the top of the Billboard charts that year were recorded by an African-American group or artist!  I can't even remember any other year where this has taken place.  Although, 2003 came really close to being similar (the only artists to have a hit that year who were not African-American were Jennifer Lopez, Eminem, and Clay Aiken).

The point is that 2004 is a perfect year to try and find a #1 song by an artist of African-American descent.  But which one should I choose?  Should I feature Usher (who had a #1 hit for twenty-eight of the year's fifty-two weeks)?  Should I choose Alicia Keys?  Ciara?  Fantasia Barrino?

Nah.  I think I'll choose this song, which actually is one of the rare songs to hit the top of the charts in two calendar years.  It first hit the #1 position on December 13, 2003 and stayed there until February 14, 2004 - an outstanding nine weeks on the charts.

And even more interesting...the song that replaced this song was recorded by the same group!

Get ready to shake it like a Polaroid picture!  Here's this week's Sunday Jukebox!



ARTIST:  OutKast
SONG:  Hey Ya!
ALBUM:  Speakerboxxx/The Love Below
DATE RELEASED:  September 9, 2003
PEAK POSITION ON THE BILLBOARD CHARTS:  #1 for 9 weeks

And, just on a personal note.  I have ALWAYS loved this song!



I mean, is it not the perfect song to get moving to?  You can dance to it.  Work out to it.  Walk a steady pace with it.  Heck, you could even listen to it at a wedding!  Or a bar mitzvah!  Or on National Pickle Day!

(Well, to some people, National Pickle Day is a huge celebration...)

So, what is there to say about this song?  I'm going to get to that in a little bit.  But first, there's a very interesting story behind this particular album, as well as what went into recording this particular song.

The album that this song appears on is actually the fifth album that was released by the duo known as OutKast.  That duo, by the way, is made up of Andre "Andre 3000" Benjamin and Antwan "Big Boi" Patton.

Well, after four albums of collaborating and scoring some decent hits like "Bombs Over Baghdad" and "Ms. Jackson", OutKast decided to go a different route with their latest collaboration.

It was decided that the duo would do a double album.  Which I suppose isn't all that unusual.  After all, lots of greatest hits packages come in double albums, and last year Justin Timberlake's 20/20 Experience album was released in two parts.  



What was unusual was the fact that the album was released as what seemed to be two separate albums by two solo artists.  The first album, "Speakerboxxx" was released by Big Boi, and "The Love Below" was Andre 3000's project.

And, there were certainly hits on both albums.  On "Speakerboxxx", "The Way You Move" hit the #1 spot in February 2004 (immediately following "Hey Ya!"), and "Ghetto Musick" was also released, while "Prototype", "Roses", and "Hey Ya!" appeared on "The Love Below" album. 

Now, the reason why the duo decided to make separate albums and release them in the same compilation had nothing to do with band troubles, nor did it signify a band break-up by any means (though the group's final album release was in 2006).  Rather, it was a way for both members of the group to try their hand at their own creative projects while keeping their commitment to the OutKast name.  Initially, critics were unsure that this was the right way for the group to go, as they believed that the two solo albums would diminish the value of the OutKast brand, but in all honesty, the different sounds of the two discs flowed together very well, and offered up several different styles and flavours of music that actually made the group more versatile. 

Who knew that the figurative split up of a group would end up making some sweeter music?  Or, at the very least, music that you could dance to!

Now, it was decided early on that the lead singles for both albums would be "The Way You Move" by Big Boi, and "Hey Ya" by Andre 3000.  But ultimately, "Hey Ya" was the much larger hit.  And, part of the reason was because of the music video.

Now, do you remember earlier in the year, I did that feature on Phil Collins' "Two Hearts", where the video showed four different Phils playing in the same band on some sort of variety show?  Well, the video for "Hey Ya" borrows that idea.  In fact, the video is designed to simulate the appearance that The Beatles made on The Ed Sullivan Show nearly fifty years ago on February 9, 1964 (that's next week, everybody).  The only major differences were that the video was supposed to be set in London and not New York (therefore making it kind of like the British television series "Top of the Pops"), and that instead of just four "Beatles", there were no less than eight different interpretations of Andre 3000!

It truly was a spectacle to be seen.

Now what's "Hey Ya" all about?  Well, contrary to what the song says, it's not about shaking it like a Polaroid picture.  Truth be told, the technique of shaking Polaroid pictures only existed on the earliest rolls of the film, which made the film dry faster if the photos were shaken.

No, if you can decipher the lyrics of the song, you might find that it is all about a person who seems to be having doubts about the relationship that he is in.  As much as he would like to have a traditional, loving relationship with his love, he questions whether or not she wants the same thing, or if they are just staying together for the sake of being together.

Because as anyone who has ever been in a loveless relationship knows, staying together for the sake of staying together is not the healthiest way to maintain a relationship. 

And by the time we get to the second verse, the narrator is thinking that maybe they should just call it a day and end the relationship for good.

And, then that is followed by Andre 3000 singing the word "Alright" about fourteen or fifteen times in a row!

(NOTE:  That lyric with the 'alrights' is probably one of the best karaoke lines to sing...or so I would like to think, considering that I haven't sang karaoke in about fifteen years or so.)

Whatever the case, this song was praised by music critics, and it lasted a total of nine weeks at the #1 position! 

And, that's not all.

Billboard magazine named it the twentieth most successul song of the decade between 2000 and 2009, and at the 46th annual Grammy Awards ceremony, the song was awarded the Best Urban/Alternative Performance award.

And, many people still consider this song to be one of OutKast's best singles.  I tend to agree.

Saturday, February 01, 2014

The Best School Days Were Snow Days!

So, I have a question for all of you reading this blog entry today - particularly those of you who happen to live in North America, and quite possibly the entire northern hemisphere.

Are you sick of all this snow yet?

I don't know what it is about the winter of 2014, but it has easily been one of the snowiest and coldest winters that I have ever experienced in my own life.  It certainly hasn't been as bad as the winter of 1997/1998, which saw a gigantic ice storm blow through my area knocking out power for several days, but it's been nasty.

(Though, those of you in the Toronto area who experienced an ice storm in December 2013 probably have some idea what the ice storm in 1998 was like for people who lived in parts of Ontario, Quebec, and New York State.)

I mean, just take a look at some of the photos of this winter that I've taken on some of the worst days of this past winter.  The picture below is one that I took on the early morning hours of December 15, 2013.



And, this one was taken just a few days ago on January 27, 2014.  And, before you say anything, I will let you know that this is NOT fog that you are seeing.  It's what we call a "snow squall" (when the wind is so strong that it blows the snow all over the place causing the visibility to be poor and the road to be very slippery.



Now, as terrible as the conditions can be this winter, it is important to note that I live in Canada.  And, in most places in Canada, snow and cold weather is nothing new.  Just imagine how the people in states like Texas, Mississippi, Louisiana, Alabama, and the two Carolinas felt upon seeing snow fall for the first time in years, having to try and drive in that stuff.  For kids in Canada, this is just a typical January day.  Down there, the states called a state of emergency and kids actually had to spend the night at school because the roads were deemed too unsafe to travel on.

Like I said, it has been one weird, wacky winter.

But you know what?  I always like to see the silver linings of things.  And, even though this winter has been a very harsh one this year, there are always some good things about this winter.  If you're lucky enough to live in Ottawa, it's estimated that this year's Winterlude should be quite successful.  And, even if you don't, with the record breaking low temperatures, the ice should be plenty solid for ice skating purposes.  And, there's no better way to spend a really cold day than by sipping a nice hot cup of hot cocoa.

But what about if you were in school?  Could the winter months be that much fun in school?

For me...yes.  They were.  And, that's exactly what this blog post is all about.  Fun activities that we did in school on some of the snowiest days of the year.

Now, granted, some of you living in warm climates might not be able to relate to this, but for those of you who have experienced a true blue Canadian winter (I've lived through thirty-two of them), I have some stories to tell you.



For instance, before schools became figuratively covered in bubblewrap so that kids can't hurt themselves or each other, the school playground after a freshly fallen snow was like a winter paradise.  For kids who loved physical exercise and didn't mind climbing, gigantic hills of snow made by the snow plows who plowed our playground made for the perfect snow forts.  They were really easy to climb too.  All we really had to do was use our boot clad feet to chop out support grips as we made our way to the top.  Of course, once we got to the top of the snow hill, there were always a group of mean sixth graders who would throw us off the hill so that they could stake their claim of the snow hill.

(Again, keep in mind that I grew up during a time in which kids were allowed to be kids and climb over things without many repercussions.  We weren't allowed to throw snowballs at each other, but we could throw someone off the top of a three and a half foot snow hill.  Go figure.)

But there were other things that we could do in the school playground if the snow forts weren't accessible.  If we ended up getting ice rain and it made some areas of the playground slippery, it was an awesome thing, because in our elementary school playground, we had this hill that sloped down towards one of the baseball diamonds near the school bleachers.  On days in which we had freezing rain, that hill would be so slippery and slick...the perfect hill to slide down at a fast speed!  And, surprisingly enough, I never did injure myself on that hill.

No, it was that one day in first grade when I was running across the icy hopscotch and four square courts that I got hurt.  Guess who did a faceplant on the number seven square of the hopscotch court and left a bloody mess?  Yep.  I did.  Fortunately, the nose wasn't broken, but it did hurt!

Of course, that was when the snow and ice was tolerable.  What happened on days in which the snow and ice made roads so bad that the buses had to be pulled off the roads? 

Well, naturally, students who relied on the bus to take them to school were forced to stay home.  But unlike the United States, which actually shuts down schools and some small businesses when the weather outside gets frightful, Canadian schools usually remain open unless the power goes out.  And as someone who lived close enough to my elementary school, I was pretty much forced to go to school on so called 'snow days'.

So, you would probably think that I would find it pretty frustrating to be forced to go to school when half of my classmates couldn't make it into school, right?

Hardly.

Truth be told, I was probably one of the few kids who LOVED going to school on snow days.  And, the reasons why are simple.

Number one - Most of the kids who frequently picked on me, harassed me, made me feel bad about myself...well, they all took the bus to school.  And when the buses were cancelled, they didn't show their faces at school.  No bullies = happy me! 

Seriously, by the time I got to my junior high school years, I wished it would have snowed every day.  Even in June.  For snow days meant happy days.  After all, most of the kids I actually liked in school lived close to the school like I did, and when there was a snow day, I actually felt like I was being respected by the other kids in the class.

Number two - We never, EVER followed lesson plans on snow days.  EVER.  You know, I think snow days were the only days in which we were allowed to play computer games during English class.  Snow days were the only days in which we were allowed to play in the gym on non-gym periods.  Snow days were the only days in which we baked chocolate chip cookies in math class.

(Which I suppose does implement some mathematical techniques, as you had to measure the right amounts of sugar, water, and chocolate chips to make the perfect cookie.)

I suppose that while snow days were fun in elementary school, high school snow days were even more fun.  Again, the kids who caused me the most grief in high school all lived in the north end of town.  And since the roads were bad, none of them showed up to class.  Again, win-win situation for me.  But in high school, we were essentially given free reign of the hallways (within reason).  If we wanted to play some jams with the musical instruments, the music room was always open.  If we wanted to practice our best basketball moves and football plays, the gym was where you wanted to be.  If you wanted a quiet place to study, the library was just a staircase away.  Or if you just wanted to satisfy your cravings for Doritos and Diet Coke, well, the school cafeteria was a nice place to hang out as well.

(Truth be told, the only time you would ever find me inside the school cafeteria was on a snow day.  I always went home for lunch and never ate one meal in there.)

Myself?  I personally liked to hang out in the school's computer lab on the third floor.  The Internet may have been sub-standard in 1998, but at the time, it had some really cool interactive games that are now offline as of 2014.  I literally spent an entire school snow day playing a murder mystery game entitled "Who Killed Laura Mitchell", and I remember being so close to solving the whole thing before the school bell rang, dismissing the few students who braved the snow and cold to attend school. 

I never did figure out who did the deed.  The website was pulled a year later.  But if any of you readers did play that game and know who did it...let me know.  Please?

So, that's my retrospective on the fun I had on snow days at school.  What are some of your memories?

Friday, January 31, 2014

The Scariest Thing I Remember From Childhood Television

You know, when I was a kid, there were a few things that I had a bit of a fear of.  In a lot of ways, I suppose that I was a lot like Chuckie Finster from the Nickelodeon cartoon "Rugrats" in that I loved to explore the world, but I didn't want to get hurt doing it.

I think that I was one of those rare kids who actually loved playing outside in the winter months moreso than the summer months.  Because in winter, all of the things that I didn't like in the summer months were either covered in mounds of snow, or stayed down south between the months of December and March.

In the summer, I was a little more cautious.  I almost drowned in a swimming pool when I was four, which lead to a fear of deep water which lasted for approximately seventeen years until I learned how to swim...and even then, I doubt that I'll be doing any scuba diving any time soon.  I used to be afraid of bees, wasps, and hornets after one stung me in between the toes when I was seven.  These days, I think bees are cool, and should be protected, given that they are dying off in record numbers.  However, I would not be too sad to see every wasp and hornet die off.  Those pests are evil.  And, don't even get me started on thistle bushes and all sharp pointy plants.  Unbeknownst to me, I found out the hard way that my backyard was overrun with them the one day I decide to walk through the yard in nothing but bare feet.

(Since that day, I always make sure I wear shoes outdoors.)

I mean, I understand that fear is subjective, and some of us have more rational fears than others.  I mean, more often than not, you have people who are afraid of snakes, spiders, heights, and dying young.  And, then you have me who still has a strong dislike of balloons popping that I have to actually have my iPod on full blast before I can pop one.

(And don't judge.  Please don't judge.  We all have our quirks.  That one happens to be mine.)

But, I should also note that I'm no longer fearful of most of the things that I was afraid of as a child.  Good thing too.  It would make for quite an isolating experience, wouldn't you agree?

I mean, there was one terrifying experience that I remember having when I was a child, and had I not outgrown that fear, I likely would have never watched television ever again!

You see, there was one particular thing that took place on television every month or so from the time I was born until the time that I was approximately sixteen.  And, by the time I was sixteen, I was completely over this scary sight on television.  But when I was a little kid and I saw this event take place on television, I would cower in fear.  Back in the days in which I was a toddler, televisions didn't come with mute buttons.

Or maybe they did on the remote control...thing is that my parents never owned a television with a remote control until the late 1980s, as I grew up with working class roots.  Not that it mattered.  At that age, I probably didn't know what the word "mute" even meant.

The point is that this particular television event used to scare me something fierce.  That sound was enough to make me want to throw all of my toys out of my toy box and just hide in there until it was all over.

Even though it only lasted thirty seconds at the most, it was easily the most terrifying thing that I have ever seen and heard.  It got to the point where whenever my mom would watch her soap operas ("The Young and the Restless", "As The World Turns", "Guiding Light", and "Capitol"), I would make it a mission not to be anywhere near the room because I always knew that the odds of seeing this terrifying spectacle was higher during the hours of daytime television.

So, what the heck could I see on television that would make me panic so much that I would avoid it at all costs?  Was it a scary cartoon character?  Was it a violent television series?  Was it the sound of the little yodeler dude plummeting off the cliff on "The Price Is Right" pricing game "Cliff Hangers"?

Actually, it was this.



The Emergency Broadcast System.  The warning system put in place for at least three decades.  The bane of my existence as a toddler.



Oh, I hated the EBS.  I hated it with the intensity of ten thousand halogen light bulbs.

I mean, that sound?  That sound was absolutely one of the scariest things that I have ever heard.  And the worst part about the test was that it did not occur at the same time every single time they did one of these tests.  It would air whenever the affiliate felt like it, and more often than not, I was surprised by it more times than I would have liked.

I couldn't quite comprehend why I hated that sound so much when I was a child at the time, and upon retrospect, I suppose that had I known the real reason behind the EBS and why it was implemented, I would have had more of a reason to fear it.

So, I suppose this is the time of the blog in which I explain what the Emergency Broadcast System was.  And, I will do that now.

Now, the Emergency Broadcast System was actually a replacement warning system for the CONELRAD system put in place during the height of the Cold War in 1951.

(CONELRAD standing for Control of Electromagnetic Radiation).

In August of 1963, CONELRAD became a more generic warning system, and was changed to the Emergency Broadcast System.  Initially when CONELRAD was founded, it was done with the purpose of warning citizens of any incoming attacks from the Soviet Union.  But by 1963, the focus slightly changed to include national crises that were taking place and severe weather warnings. 




That meant that if a hurricane was approaching, the EBS would sound loudly in the affected areas, as well as a vocal recording explaining the situation.  If an earthquake shook up a large city, you can bet that car radios would soon feature something like the warning below on both the AM and FM dials.



Yep.  That sound still kind of gives me goose bumps, even years later.  I mean, granted this was a mock-up that some random YouTuber made up, but still I suppose it would sound somewhat similar.

And, if, say...a series of riots broke out in the middle of a gigantic city like Los Angeles during the spring of 1992...well, the EBS had you covered.  Take a look at this broadcast from April 30, 1992 - right around the time of the Los Angeles racial riots.



Scary sights, no?  I remember being a ten year old boy watching the coverage of those riots and being completely horrified at some of the images that I was seeing on the television screen.  And yet, had I been a little bit younger, I would have been more freaked out by the high pitched noise from the EBS!  Funny how life works as a child, doesn't it?

Anyway, between 1963 and 1996, it is estimated that the EBS was activated at least twenty thousand times by network affiliates for mostly testing purposes, but occasionally they would be used for local weather happenings.  And it should be noted that in the EBS' thirty-four year history, the EBS was never activated nationally for a crisis affecting the United States.

Well...actually, it was...accidentally.

If you were around on February 20, 1971 at around 9:33am, you may have bore witness to an accidental broadcast of the EBS.  Apparently, a teletype operator by the name of W.S. Eberhardt accidentally played the wrong tape during a routine test of the EBS and what he inadvertedly did was broadcast the EBS signal coast to coast from California to Maine, indicating that a national emergency was taking place!  Fortunately, the whole hullabaloo lasted a grand total of 40 minutes before being cancelled, however it did serve some purpose.  It showed that there were still some bugs to work out in the system, as many stations never received the signal, and those that did mostly ignored it, believing that it was only a test.  Only about 20% of all television stations in the United States heeded the warning, which would actually be kind of pathetic - especially if it were a real live emergency.

But luckily, the EBS never had to be used for such a national disaster.  It was featured in fictional apocalyptic films such as "Dawn of the Dead" and "The Day After", but it was never used for a real emergency...which was good, as it would have made me fear it a lot more.



But all things come to an end, and an updated system known currently as the Emergency Alert System was put into place on January 1, 1997 - effectively broadening the coverage, making warnings appear quicker, and allowing the president of the United States to address the nation within ten minutes.

And the best part about the EAS?  The sound became a lot less annoying and scary.  At least, to me anyway.



Thursday, January 30, 2014

My Low-Budget Anti-Bullying Vid!

Okay, so I wanted to explain the purpose for this particular blog.  Firstly, I wanted to tell you something that you likely already know.  This blog has been (and continues to be) a non-profit venture.  While I eventually do want to make a career out of writing at some point, I think that by including ads and PayPal donation boxes in the blog kind of takes away a lot of the fun that the blog presents.  Maybe down the road, I could reconsider this, but for now, I think it's best that I keep this blog going the way that it is now.

So, what does this mean?  Well, it means operating the blog on a shoestring budget.


And, when I say shoestring budget, I mean no budget.


I mean, seriously.  I'm using a 16 GB iPad mini to film my videos.  It does the job, but it's hardly considered advanced high definition technology.  So, it's kind of hard for me to make really decent video projects.
Like, take this example of an anti-bullying video I made.  Sure, it could have gone a lot better...but I think it kind of works.  After all, I do make a pop culture reference to one of the longest running game shows of all time!

Have a look.  And please, be gentle.




Wednesday, January 29, 2014

Trivial Pursuit

Hey, everybody!  I hope you're ready for another edition of the anything goes feature known as the Whatever Wednesday piece.  And, for today's entry, I'm letting you know ahead of time that this is going to be one of those "can I write an entire blog entry in just three hours" kind of deals.  I've done it before, and I'm sure I can do it again.  I just have to draw the right card in order to make it happen.

So, let's make it happen right now, shall we?



Hmm...well, it looks as though I have drawn the Mr. Green card for today.  This means that we'll be taking a look at some sort of game that kids (and some adults) like to play with.

But what sort of thing am I going to talk about today?  I need to find some sort of game that I can talk about in an interesting manner while keeping in mind that I only have a limited amount of time to talk about it.  Oh, what do I talk about?

You see, this is one of those moments where you're playing that trivia game where you go around a board looking to fill up your little wheel with colourful wedges in hopes of being crowned the king (or queen) of trivia and you need that one final wedge, and you don't know what the answer to the question is.  It's almost like trying to find a topic for today's blog piece.  Oh, what is that game called?



Ah, yes.  Thank you random YouTube video!  Trivial Pursuit.  Anyway, I need to find a topic for today so that I don't waste any time trying to brainstorm ideas and...


...WAIT A MINUTE!  That's it!  Why don't I just do a blog on Trivial Pursuit!  After all, everyone's played the game at least once in their lives, right?  And, it was the most popular board game of the 1980s, which some would call the height of the trivia game era.  

Yes, that settles it.  Trivial Pursuit it is!

Now, everybody knows what the game is all about.  The game is played with as little as two players, but as many as six, and each playing piece looks like this.



Kind of resembles a miniature pie, doesn't it?

Anyway, the goal of the game is to roll the die and move around the board so that you land on a coloured square.  Each colour represents a different subject (kind of similar to each Clue suspect card represents a different theme day on the Whatever Wednesday blog entries).  And, just to clarify, depending on the version of Trivial Pursuit you are playing, these subjects can change.  But if you're playing the original version, these are the six colours, as well as the subjects they represent.

BLUE - Geography
PINK - Entertainment
YELLOW - History
BROWN - Arts & Literature
GREEN - Science & Nature
ORANGE - Sports & Leisure

Okay, so ideally what you want to do is answer all six categories correctly in six consecutive turns and win the game in about as long as it takes to heat up a frozen pizza in the oven.  But the funny thing about Trivial Pursuit is that more often than not, you'll likely land on four consecutive green spaces and you will be forced to answer those questions before you land on the brown square that you absolutely need to win the game.

And, for those of us who are more knowledgeable in some topics than others, that could be one of the most frustrating aspects of the whole game.  I mean, just looking at that list of categories, I can definitely tell you that I would have no trouble earning pink or brown wedges.  I could even have success with blue and yellow, as geography and history were among my best subjects.  But green wedges were quite hard for me to get.  And, we won't discuss how difficult it was for me to get an orange wedge.  As someone who never watches sports, I was rendered completely useless if I was asked a sports related question.

And yet somehow, I would almost always land on orange and green squares.  Life just wasn't fair sometimes.

By the end of the game, your playing piece should look like this.



Sounds simple...but the questions certainly weren't.  I'll give you some examples of what I mean later on in this piece.

For now, let's talk a bit about how the game was invented, as well as some of the controversy that took place upon the game's arrival on store shelves.

Believe it or not, Trivial Pursuit was created by a couple of Canadians.  The concept was drawn up by Chris Haney and Scott Abbott in Montreal, Quebec on one frosty day in December 1979.  At the time, Haney worked for "The Gazette" as a photo editor and Abbott was a sports editor for "The Canadian Press".  The story goes that both men were trying to play a game of "Scrabble" together, but with half of the letter tiles missing, it made the game unusable.  So the pair decided to create their own game, and by 1982 the men felt comfortable enough to release it in stores.

It started off slowly with only a few units sold the first year that it was released.  However, a sudden demand for quiz like games saw Trivial Pursuit rise in popularity sharply.  By 1984, it was easily the biggest selling board game in the world, with some twenty million copies sold worldwide.  As of 2014, the game has been translated into seventeen different languages, and at last count was available for purchase in almost thirty different countries.

Of course, there was a little bit of controversy over Trivial Pursuit.  And, in both cases, the creators of the game were accused of stealing ideas from other people.

In October 1984 - which was right around the time that the game was at its most popular - a man by the name of Fred L. Worth claimed that the creators of the game had stolen questions and answers from his book "The Trivia Encyclopedia" to use in the game - even typing the questions with the same spelling errors as the ones made in the book!  In fact, one of the questions was about the television series "Columbo" asking what his real first name was, and it was incorrectly listed as Philip in the book - as well as the Trivial Pursuit game card!  The two men who created the game acknowledged that they did borrow facts from Worth's book, but also argued that trivia facts are not protected by copyright, therefore the claims of copyright infringement could not be proven.  A judge agreed, and threw out Worth's $300 million lawsuit against Haney and Abbott.

And then ten years later in 1994, a man from Cape Breton, Nova Scotia named David Wall launched a lawsuit of his own against the duo, claiming that he and a friend were hitchhiking around the Sydney, Nova Scotia area in the fall of 1979 - three months before Trivial Pursuit was created.  He claimed that Chris Haney picked them up and gave them a ride.  And along the way, it was Wall who had given Haney the idea for the creation of Trivial Pursuit, right down to the playing piece designs.

In short, Wall was claiming that Haney had stolen his idea and wanted compensation for it. 

Three problems though.

First, David Wall's mother claimed that Wall had drawings of the Trivial Pursuit board and playing pieces located in his room around the time that the game was being planned, but unfortunately the drawings had been thrown out long ago.  Secondly, the friend who was supposedly hitchhiking with Wall on the day that Haney allegedly gave both of them a ride chose not to testify in the lawsuit.  And lastly, Haney claimed that he had never seen Wall before in his life.

Eventually, the court ruled against Wall's claims due to lack of substantial evidence, though it was in the courts for a good dozen years!

Hey, wouldn't that make a good trivia question?

And speaking of trivia questions, I thought that I would try my hand at making my very own Trivial Pursuit card.  I have six questions, one of each category with the subjects based on the original trivia game.  And, I'll have the answers hidden within this blog.  You just may have to do a little bit of digging.

Ready?  Let's do this.

1.  What Canadian city can boast having Canada's largest shopping plaza?
Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.  The mall is the West Edmonton Mall.
2.  On which television soap opera did "Who's The Boss" star Judith Light play a hooker?
One Life To Live
3.  In a 1994 question and answer session on MTV, which United States President admitted that when given the choice between boxers and briefs, he usually wore briefs?
President Bill Clinton
4.  What is the name of the fictional language spoken in George Orwell's book "Nineteen Eighty-Four"?
Newspeak

5.  On May 18, 1980, what event took place in Skamania County, Washington?
The eruption of Mt. St. Helens.

6.  The last year that this city won both the World Series and the Stanley Cup was in 1993.  Name this city.
Toronto, Ontario.

Tuesday, January 28, 2014

January 28, 1986

Welcome to this week's Tuesday Timeline...and while I will usually admit to choosing dates that are mostly linked with happy events, this date certainly is not the case.  The after effects of this events were so tragic and felt for years to come, and many people (myself included) bore witness to this horrible event.

This being said, why don't we take a look at some of the other moments that took place on this date throughout history.

On this date in...

1393 - King Charles VI is nearly killed during a masquerade ball after the costumes of several dancers caught on fire

1547 - Henry VIII passes away, leaving his nine-year-old son, Edward VI in charge

1624 - Sir Thomas Warner founds the first British colony in the Caribbean

1754 - The word "serendipity" is coined by Harold Walpole in a letter to Horace Mann

1813 - Jane Austen's "Pride and Prejudice" is first published in the United Kingdom

1851 - Northwestern University becomes the first chartered university in Illinois

1855 - A locomotive on the Panama Canal Railway travels from the Atlantic Ocean to the Pacific Ocean - the first time a train has ever made that journey

1878 - The Yale Daily News becomes the first daily college newspaper to be printed in the United States

1887 - The world's largest snowflakes fall in a snowstorm in Montana, with flakes measuring fifteen inches wide and eight inches thick

1902 - The Carnegie Institution of Washington is founded

1915 - The United States Coast Guard is created by U.S. Congress

1917 - The first use of municipally-owned street cars in San Francisco, California takes place on this date

1932 - Japanese forces attack Shanghai

1935 - Iceland becomes the first country in the Western Hemisphere to legalize therapeutic abortion

1956 - Elvis Presley makes his very first television appearance

1958 - The design of the Lego building block is patented

1965 - The newly designed Canadian flag with the maple leaf design is chosen by an Act of Parliament

1977 - The first day of the Great Blizzard of 1977 begins with over ten feet of snow falling upon Upstate New York in one day

1979 - CBS Sunday Morning News debuts

1985 - "We Are The World" by USA for Africa is recorded

1996 - Superman creator Jerry Siegel (b. 1914) passes away at the age of 81

And, best birthday wishes go out to the following people; Philip Levine, Alan Alda, Cash McCall, Dick Taylor, Karen Lynn Gorney, Gregg Popovich, Barbi Benton, Chris Carter, Frank Skinner, Dave Sharp, Keith Hamilton Cobb, Sam Phillips, Dan Spitz, Lynda Boyd, Sarah McLachlan, Kathryn Morris, Mo Rocca, Anthony Hamilton, Terri Conn, Matt DeVries, Joey Fatone, Nick Carter, Elijah Wood, J. Cole, and Ariel Winter.

And now for today's date...a date that will forever be linked to great tragedy.



We're going back in time twenty-eight years to January 28, 1986.  And, most people who were around that day know just how sad a day it was.  In fact, January 28, 1986 is the date linked to one of the earliest memories that I can remember.  And, though the entire day remains fragmented (I was only four and a half, after all), and I can't remember everything that happened on that day specifically.  But I do remember one thing about it.

That was the day that I was supposed to watch my very first space shuttle launch on television.

Because I completely skipped junior kindergarten in my youth, I was home on the morning that the launch was to take place.  And I also seem to recall being really excited to watch the launch take place because at the time I really was into all things space.  I loved reading about planets and solar systems at the library, and probably could have told you the difference between Mercury and Mars even back then.  And I had missed all of the other significant space related events by several years (the moon landing for instance), and really wanted to watch something to do with space.

I don't know how I remember this little detail, but I remember that the space shuttle launch actually pre-empted "The Price is Right" on the East Coast because the launch was scheduled for just after 11:30 that morning.  And for a news event to pre-empt "The Price is Right", you knew that it was a big day.

Certainly I remember reading about how several schools brought in television sets and teachers had their students watching the launch in class.  It was certainly shaping up to be one of the biggest space launches of the 1980s.

And it was...for all the wrong reasons.

At 11:38am EST, the space shuttle launched, and I remember seeing it lifting up towards the sky, completely glued to the television screen in excitement and interest.

But then just seventy-three seconds later, this happened.



I can only speak for myself, and granted, I don't really remember what my actual reaction was on that day...but I just knew that something had gone wrong.  I couldn't comprehend the fact that there were actual people inside of that rocket and that all of the people aboard were now dead.  All I remember was seeing that gigantic explosion...and proceeding to tell everybody on the street all about it whenever I went out anywhere.  I imagine that had I known just how tragic a loss it was, I probably wouldn't have been so eager to keep talking about it.  But then again, I was only four and a half at the time.



On this date twenty-eight years ago, the space shuttle Challenger exploded, and seven astronauts lost their lives, causing the space exploration program in the United States to be postponed for nearly three years for safety purposes.

The seven astronauts who were aboard the Challenger are featured in this photo below, taken in November 1985 - just two months before the explosion.



In the front row are Michael J. Smith, Dick Scobee, and Ron McNair.  In the back row, Ellison S. Onizuka, Christa McAuliffe, Greg Jarvis, and Judy Resnik.

The deaths of all seven astronauts was tragic enough, but it should be noted that Christa McAuliffe's death was especially reported on.  Had the launch been successful, McAuliffe would have become the first teacher (and civilian) to go into outer space.  It also explains why so many school children watched the event live on television because of the excitement surrounding the launch.  McAuliffe herself was selected from a pool of over 11,000 applicants who applied for the launch, and was expected to conduct experiments and teach a couple of lessons while up in space.

She never got the chance.

When the disaster happened, it was estimated that within an hour of the explosion, some 85% of the American population had heard about it by watching it on television, hearing the news on the radio, or just simply from word of mouth.  When you stop and think about it, that's actually more impressive than you'd think, given that the Internet was not readily accessible in 1986.

But it took a lot of investigating before a cause could be found as to why the Challenger broke apart seventy-three seconds into its launch.  And these investigations revealed not only what caused the disintegration of the shuttle, but also revealed that some of the astronauts may have been still alive when the shuttle crashed into the Atlantic Ocean.
You see, the Challenger wasn't exactly a brand new space shuttle.  The first voyage took place in 1983.  The mission that was being performed on January 28, 1986 was the tenth mission that featured the Challenger.  And, because the craft had been used in several missions before, it probably would have been a good idea to make sure that the craft was in perfect working order before launching it into space.

However, there were several things that didn't seem right.

The first thing that the investigation noted was that when the design of the solid rocket boosters within the space shuttle was flawed from the very beginning, since contractor Morton Thiokol brought forth his design some nine years before the disaster.  The design featured a potentially catastrophic flaw in the O-rings...and that flaw was exposed as a result of extremely low temperatures in the air that morning.

Now, had the launch been held later on in the year, perhaps everything would have gone according to plan.  But then again, the launch was planned from Cape Canaveral on January 28, 1986 (after being postponed several times due to inclement weather), and because Cape Canaveral is in Florida, it was expected that the temperature would be high enough for the launch to take place.

The weather report for the early morning hours of January 28, 1986?  Cold.  I'm talking below freezing at twenty-eight degrees Fahrenheit (-2 Celsius).  It was so cold that day that ice was actually forming on the shuttle itself as well as the launch tower.  And, that made everybody very concerned.  Prior to that day, the coldest that the temperature was when a space shuttle was launched was fifty-three degrees Fahrenheit...some twenty-five degrees warmer than it was on that morning.  Certainly the engineers at Rockwell headquarters were absolutely horrified at the amount of ice that coated the launch site as they felt that the breaking ice could cause major damage to the craft upon launch.  Rockwell actually warned against launching the shuttle that day, but the launch was never cancelled.  It was actually postponed by one hour while crews worked on melting the ice so that the craft would pass inspection by the Ice Team.  By the time the shuttle was cleared for launch, the ice had melted enough to go ahead with the mission as planned.

However, the mission was doomed from the start regardless of the ice that was outside of the shuttle.  Because as it turned out, that fatal flaw involving the O-rings?  The flaw was temperature related.  According to several sources, the O-rings were never tested in temperatures that were below fifty degrees (of which the temperature that day was significantly lower).  And, it was also reported that there was also a flaw in how the rings were built.  When the space shuttle was in launch, the O-ring joints in the solid rocket boosters were to close tightly due to forces generated during ignition, but when pressurized water was used to simulate the effects of booster combustion, the metal parts actually bent away from each other, which allowed a gap to open up which could cause gases to leak through causing the air pressure to drop.  This caused the combustion gases to erode the O-rings, which could have feasibly caused a catastrophic disaster.

And, that's exactly how the Challenger plummeted out of the sky.  The erosion of the O-ring caused a breach in the solid rocket booster, sending pressurized hot gas from within the solid rocket motor to reach the outside, causing structural failure and making the rocket break apart in mid-air.



Now, what made the situation even more tragic was the revelation that many of the shuttle's crew were still conscious when it crashed into the Atlantic Ocean...but because it was hypothesized that they were unconscious when the shuttle hit the water, and because there were no emergency exits built inside the shuttle, the surviving astronauts ended up drowning inside the shuttle.

And so marked the end of the lives of seven astronauts who hoped to go into outer space...and so marked the end of the space exploration program until 1989.

And, thus the date of January 28, 1986 will forever live on in history.

This blog is dedicated in memory of the seven astronauts who died that day.



Gregory Bruce Jarvis (1944-1986)
Sharon Christa McAuliffe (1948-1986)
Ronald Ervin McNair (1951-1986)
Ellison Shoji Onizuka (1946-1986)
Judith Arlene Resnik (1949-1986)

Francis Richard Scobee (1939-1986)

Michael John Smith (1945-1986)