Search This Blog

Friday, April 24, 2015

Just Be Yourself Online!

April 24, 2015

I don't argue that the Internet can be a great source of information and entertainment. You can use it as an encyclopedia, you can use it to play games, you can use it to interact with thousands of people all over the world. 

There is a downside to having the freedom to use the Internet...people who log on to knowingly cause trouble as a way to screw around with sites and play mind games with innocent posters who just want to use the Internet in peace. 





Obviously, some Internet crimes are punishable by the criminal courts. Hacking into government sites can get you a hefty prison term. Same deal with online pyramid scams. I even hear that new laws are being passed that will make punishments for cyberbullying much more severe, which is news that I applaud. 

But, what about things people do that SEEM to be legal online, but can get you into a world of trouble in the real world? 

Allow me to show some examples off to you... 

Everyone's played those games where they play online with people all over the world...you know, games like World of Warcraft, Final Fantasy Online, TetrisFriends...and, we all know that during the chat rooms, there's always some moron who insults the gamers online, or tries to hit on a female gamer, etc. Online, there's not a whole lot that is done, aside from people telling these other people off. 

Now, if this were in a real video arcade (assuming that there are some arcades that survived the great arcade purge of the mid 1990's), you might have a mob scene or a fist fight, with teeth being flung one way and blood flowing out the other while scared patrons dodge loose quarters and arcade tickets. 

Being online might give you enough anonymity to make comments to people that you don't dare make in the real world, but that doesn't mean that you should do it! 

Which brings me to my next point. 

Why is it that some people feel the need to come up with more than one username for the same website? I mean, don't get me wrong here...granted, I do know a couple of people who do have more than one screenname, but in their case, it's just to reap more rewards on Facebook games that they play here, like Farmville, or Mafia Wars, or Candy Crush Saga. I don't understand the Facebook game craze, but at least they aren't using their dual names to cause anyone else grief...well, except those who grow their online rutabagas the honest way, that is... 

It's when people make up fake profiles to harass or bully a legitimate poster or cause that really grinds my gears, as Family Guy's Peter Griffin'd say. You can go on any website, and see some person whose profile is obviously fake, hiding behind their fake name to cause trouble. And, surprisingly enough, I don't know why people don't get more outraged over this to consider it a real problem. 

But, if you tried this in the real world, oh, let's make a list of all the crimes you could be charged with. 

Fraud, Identity Theft (if you use someone else's name), Stalking (if you use fake names to harass the same person), for starters. 

And, that's just the legal charges. 

I mean, could you imagine storming into a funeral service just to make light of the service or say disgusting things about the recently deceased? In the real world, this would be inexcusable...yet on memorial pages on Facebook, that's exactly what some of these cowards do. 

What else can I add to this? 

I don't know about you, but if I were to start setting up shop in a random part of town without so much as a permit, I could get arrested, or at the very least, told to pack up and leave. Yet, spammers hock their wares online all the time. And, often, on sites they have no business being on. Maybe there are some comic book fans who have a secret obsession with diazepam, but it makes absolutely no sense to join a comic book forum, and have all your posts talking about the wonders of Viagra. 

And, don't even get me started on people releasing viruses online to infect people's computers to steal information and kill computers. As bad as computer viruses are, real viruses are worse. Good luck escaping criminal charges by releasing viruses into the real world. Heck, good luck keeping your LIFE! 

The reason I wrote this note is because I am genuinely concerned. Some people who may end up being the nicest folks you could encounter on the street could show a completely different side to them online, and vice versa. I think that there should be more done to ensure that going online is as safe and pleasant an experience as possible. If that means really cracking down on security measures, that's fine. 

Just remember...some of the stuff that you may think is funny in an online setting, can get you 15 - 20 years in prison on the street. 

Just be yourself...online AND off.  But within reason.  No need to share your Social Insurance Number with the world!

Thursday, April 23, 2015

Stop Being A Smart Phone Zombie!

April 23, 2015

I think we're getting to the point where we rely so much on instant gratification that we insist on getting news as it happens anytime we want.

Seriously, we live in a society in which it's never been easier to get information.  With WiFi connections at practically every single coffee shop in the world and new websites being created every minute, you can find out practically anything you want in just seconds.

Isn't the Internet fun?

Of course, some of the information presented online can get a little bit repetitive.  I think I lost count at 100 times that I saw information on the "Full House" reunion that is set to happen on "Netflix" sometime next year.

(Oh, and fun fact here.  Candace Cameron bure will be 40 years old when the show will make its return in 2016 - which is older than any of the adult characters when the original show debuted in 1987!  How's that for freaky?)

Anyway, we're not going to talk about "Full House" in this diary entry.  Instead, we're going to be talking about how easy it is to get information from the Internet...as well as how easy it is to alienate everybody around you while you're getting this information.



Now, I get it.  These days every single person in the world seems to have at least one cellular phone.  I admit that I have a phone myself which I use semi-often.  I'm the type of person who actually uses a phone to...well, you know...call people.  I don't mind texting, but I'm not very good at it. 

I'm basically a "Damn You Autocorrect" moment waiting to happen.

And while I do find it awesome that I can visit Facebook, or even update my blog using my cell phone...I very rarely use my phone for that.  I honestly haven't figured out how to update my blog through my phone, and to be perfectly honest, I prefer using an old fashioned desktop computer for my writing.

Truth be told, if I could find a retro style typewriter, I would rather use one of those.  I love old school typewriters!

But do you know what I don't love?  I don't love people who are so obsessed with what they are downloading on their phones that they completely tune out everything and everyone to focus all of their attention on a five inch screen...or whatever size your cell phone just happens to be.

Here's a prime example of this.

Now, at my workplace, if you work an eight hour shift, you typically get an hour for lunch.  And most people I know spend their hour inside of the employee lounge.  There are times in which I will be sitting at a table all to myself and I will have people sit down and join me, which I do not have a problem with.  I can be quite a chatty person if I am in the mood and I really love having deep conversations with people.

What I don't enjoy is having a group of people sitting at my table, pulling out their cell phones and completely ignoring me to have a rousing game of candy crush, or texting their main man or woman, or updating their Twitter feed.  To me, it's a little bit rude.

Even ruder still is when someone at the table finds something of interest, and they feel the need to pull out their phone and show everyone at the table - and they completely forget to acknowledge you at all.  I can't even begin to tell you how many times that I have seen people showing off videos on their phones and completely freeze me out, as if I'm not important enough to see it, or because I actually want to spend my lunch hour socializing face to face instead of through a tiny phone screen.

As much as it pains me to say this, one of the ways in which I take action against this is by bringing my iPod to work and drown everyone else out.  It sometimes sucks that I have to take on the "if you can't beat 'em, join 'em" approach, but what's the point of trying to engage conversation with people who basically don't even notice that you're there.

But here's the difference.  If someone were to sit down at my table, I would remove the iPod and chat. 

In closing...put away the damn cell phones when you're at a table with other people and maybe get to know the people who are around you instead of ignoring them.



If I wanted to watch zombies, I'd turn on "the Walking Dead."

Wednesday, April 22, 2015

25 Things You Didn't Know About Me - Really!

Typically speaking, I don't go out of my way to purchase so-called celebrity magazines.  You know, magazines such as People, Rolling Stone, Hello!, and Life & Style?

That said, I will read them if they are sitting on a table at a doctor's office, or laying on a table in the employee lounge at work.  After all, they're quite easy to digest, and in some cases they've provided me with a lot of inspiration for some of the topics you've read in this blog over the last four years.

In fact, one magazine has inspired this post!



Have any of you heard of the magazine known as "Us Weekly"?  It's a magazine that was founded in 1977 by the New York Times Company, and over the course of the last thirty-eight years, the magazine has covered a wide array of celebrity news, gossip, and trends coming out of Hollywood. 

(True Story:  For the longest time, I believed that Us Weekly was actually called U.S. Weekly, and I thought that it was a magazine that featured nothing but American stories, American celebrities, and American everything.  In reality?  It's probably only 85% American.  They do the occasional story about One Direction, Kylie Minogue, and Celine Dion.)

Anyway, Us Weekly has quite a few regular features inside of its pages that keeps readers entertained.  For instance, they have a "Fashion Police" section which takes a look at what celebrities were wearing and either praises them or pan them.  It's like having Giuliana Rancic in your living room.  Whether that's a good thing or not?  Well, that's your call.

Us Musts takes a look at the newest television shows, CD's, and movies that are out, and gives recommendations on what to scope out and what to avoid.

And then there's my personal favourite.  It's a little blurb that takes up no more than half a page of the magazine, but it allows you to learn so much about your favourite famous people.

It's a feature where celebs list off twenty-five facts that people might not know about them.  And for what it's worth, you learn a lot about people.  Most of the celebs take it seriously.  Some take it semi-seriously.  And some like Weird Al Yankovic handled this piece with such sarcasm that it's hard to tell whether there really are any serious answers in the bunch or not.

(Seriously, just click HERE and read his list.  It'll crack you up.)

Anyway, I thought that I would do my own list.  And in this case, this is going to prove to be a challenge.  You see, I've been keeping this blog going for four years now, and I don't know if I have any more things to share that you already don't know.

But you know what?  I'll give it my best shot.

So, I've reached into the depths of my brain and I have come up with 25 things that you probably didn't know about me...well, until now that is.

Okay, let's go.



1.  I would die a very happy man if I never ever heard the words "Kardashian", "Jenner", or "Kanye West" again.



2.  I have a small collection of novelty socks.  Here is just one of many pairs that I have.  With us having a strict dress code at my workplace, it's the only form of self-expression I have.

3.  At my workplace, I can use the key cutting machine, I can use the paint shaker, I can operate the shopping cart pusher, and I've worked in at least half a dozen different departments.  



4.  This was the very first banner that I ever designed in my life.  This banner was painted in 2014.

5.  The font that I used in this banner is called "Variex" - which is the same font that I use for this blog's logo.

6.  I can probably count the number of weddings that I have ever attended on one hand.



7.  When I have a day off, or I am working on something that requires me to do some messy work, I'll purposely wear clothes that don't match.  Don't believe me?  Here's proof.



8.  I have every song that hit #1 on the charts on every single one of my birthdays downloaded onto my iPod from "Bette Davis Eyes" to "All of Me".



9.  One year, I spent my entire March Break holiday playing Final Fantasy 6 on my Super Nintendo.  Everyone else I knew went away for the holiday.  What else was there to do?



10.  I love Old Navy clothing and I really wish that a location would open up where I live so I don't have to travel eighty-three kilometres to go to Old Navy.

11.  I was absolutely terrified of a gigantic neon foot sign inside of a local sporting goods shop in my hometown, and until the sign was taken down, I would not even walk inside of the store.



12.  My favourite gum to chew as a child was Wrigley's Juicy Fruit.  I still chew it on occasion.

13.  I've fallen down a total of seven flights of stairs in my entire life.

14.  I have a tiny scar on my head that is covered by my hair.  I fell down a slide and cracked my head open at the bottom of the slide.



15.  My least favourite colour in the world is yellow.  Interestingly enough, I just purchased a yellow M&m's wristwatch because I like the yellow M&m's mascot.



16.  I once dumped an entire bottle of Oil of Olay on my head when I was four years old.  I wonder if that's why people think I look younger than I really am.

17.  Although I was born and raised in Canada, some people claim that I have an American accent.



18.  I am only twelve books away from having a completed Archie Digest collection.



19.  My body wash of choice is almost always Old Spice.



20.  I use a deodorant called "Mesmerize" - which I'm not ashamed to admit that I order from the AVON catalogue.

21.  I have never played any of the games in the Call of Duty series.

22.  I use a different coloured pen at work each day. 



23.  I have the entire series of "Three's Company" on DVD format.

24.  I cannot function in a pristine room.  I have to have some clutter scattered around in some manner or else I cannot concentrate.



25.  Believe it or not, my very first swimsuit was a lime green Speedo.  Mind you, I was only three years old at the time, and have never worn a Speedo since.  You're welcome, by the way.

Tuesday, April 21, 2015

April 21, 1977

It's time for another edition of the Tuesday Timeline, and this week, we're going to be looking at a topic that is very close to the theatre scene.

And admittedly, my knowledge of the theatre scene is quite limited.  I've only ever seen one production of "The Phantom of the Opera".  And that was in May of 1995. 

But, when you live four hours away from Toronto (the place where I saw Phantom of the Opera) and about nine hours from New York City (the place where Broadway comes to life almost every night), it makes it hard to enjoy the theatre scene.  And, high school productions of "As You Like It" and "Bye Bye Birdie" just don't have that same effect - although both of the plays that I watched in high school were acted quite well.

Anyway, today's Timeline is all about Broadway musicals.  But before we get started with that, we have some other events to look at first.  Shall we have a look at some of the things that happened on April 21?

753 BC - The date that Romulus founds the city of Rome

1509 - Henry VIII ascends the throne of England

1918 - "The Red Baron" is shot down and killed over Vaux-sur-Somme, France during World War I

1934 - "The Surgeon's Photograph" (which showed a photo of the legendary Loch Ness Monster) is published in "The Daily Mail" (the photo was declared a fake sixty-five years later, in 1999)

1952 - In the United States, Secretary's Day is first observed

1962 - The Seattle World's Fair - the first World's Fair to be held in the United States since World War II - opens

1970 - Elton John makes his solo debut as a performer when he opens for T.Rex at a gig in London

1982 - Rollie Fingers of the Milwaukee Brewers becomes the first pitcher to record 300 saves

1989 - Over a hundred thousand students gather in China's Tianamen Square to commemorate Chinese reform leader Hu Yaobang

2003 - EMI and Universal Music sue Napster for copyright violations

2012 - Two trains collide head on with each other in Amsterdam, injuring at least 116 people

And, well...that's it.  Apparently, April 21 was one of those days in which not a whole lot happened.

So, let's have a look at celebrity birthdays, shall we?

The following people are turning one whole year older today; Queen Elizabeth IIElaine May, Angela Mortimer, Charles Grodin, James Dobson, Iggy Pop, Patti LuPone, Tony Danza, Steve Vickers, James Morrison, Andie MacDowell, Robert Smith, Cathy Cavadini, Roy Dupuis, John Cameron Mitchell, Robin Meade, Toby Stephens, Nicole Sullivan, Eric Mabius, Jamie Sale, James McAvoy, Tony Romo, Brianne Davis, Terrence J, Shayna Fox, Robbie Amell, Christoph Sanders, and Princess Isabella of Denmark.

How cool that we start the celebrity birthday segment with a royal and end it off with a royal?  (Well, okay, I find it neat.)

And today's date for the Tuesday Timeline is also a neat one.



We're going back in time thirty-eight years in the past to April 21, 1977.

And for what it's worth, a lot happened on this date.  We said farewell to Gummo Marx, who died on this date.  We said hello to Canadian figure skater Jamie Sale, who was born on this date.  And Frank Sinatra and Friends first aired on ABC with special guests Natalie Cole and John Denver.

But it was also a big day in the world of Broadway, as it was on this date that a famous musical first debuted.  It was a musical that ran for nearly six years in its original run on Broadway, and won a total of seven Tony Awards during the show's first year.

And the Broadway show even spawned a hit movie!



No...not this version.  I don't even want to talk about the 2014 version of this movie, which in my opinion should have never been made.  And it's nothing to do with the actress who played Annie - I think that Quvenzhane Wallis did a fine job as Annie.  My issue was with the changes that this version made to the plot. 



No, I'm talking about the more superior 1982 version of "Annie", which starred Aileen Quinn.  That version was always one of my favourites.



And of course, the movie was based from the Broadway musical of the same name which debuted - you guessed it - thirty-eight years ago today!



Of course, anyone who has seen the show "Annie" probably can tell you where the idea originally came from.  Years ago, there was a comic strip called "Little Orphan Annie", created by Harold Gray.  Beginning in 1924, the comic strip detailed the life of a little curly haired girl named Annie who along with her dog Sandy struggle to make it in a world of cruelty and coldness - likely spawned by the fact that she was an orphan who lived in an orphanage run by a cruel woman who hated kids (the comic strip gave her the name of Miss Asthma, but in the Broadway play and movie, she is known as Miss Hannigan).  It wasn't until she crossed paths with the wealthy, but kind Daddy Warbucks that Annie begins to find her place in the world.

So, how did "Annie" go from a comic strip to a Broadway musical?

Well, the story actually begins in 1976.  The production was jointly produced by Charles Strouse (music), Martin Charnin (lyrics), and Thomas Meehan.  It held its unofficial debut in August 1976 at the Goodspeed Opera House in East Haddam, Connecticut under the direction of Michael P. Price.  And originally, the actress who starred as the title role was Kristen Vigard.  Vigard lasted a few days in the role, but producers didn't quite feel as though she didn't quite fit the part.  See, Annie was supposed to be this gritty orphan who had a "Hard Knock Life", but Vigard proved to be a little bit too sweet.  She was kept on as understudy, but the main role then went to Andrea McArdle, who would eventually play the role for another year.  But don't feel too bad for Vigard - she landed a role on "Guiding Light" just a few years later.



TRIVIA:  Andrea McArdle would play another role in the musical as an adult.  She played the role of Miss Hannigan for a couple of performances of the play in 2010.

It wouldn't be until April 21, 1977 that the play made its official debut on Broadway.  It opened up at the Alvin Theatre in New York (which has since been renamed The Neil Simon Theatre), and featured the cast of McArdle, Reid Shelton as Daddy Warbucks, Dorothy Loudon as Miss Hannigan, and Sandy Faison as Grace Farrell.  The show closed in January 1983.  At the time, it was the longest running musical to feature at the Alvin Theatre/Neil Simon Theatre until 2009 when "Hairspray" broke the record.

Since then, the show has been periodically revived in several places around the world such as New York, London, and Sydney.



I guess it always goes to show you that no matter where you are, tomorrow is always a day away. 

Monday, April 20, 2015

What Not To Wear - First Date Edition

You know, four years ago when I had my gall bladder removed, I was pretty much incapacitated for eight weeks.  I needed to do something in my off time to pass the time while I healed.

One way I did that was by reading lots of stuff, either in book form, or in online articles. 

A couple of these articles were on first dates, and specifically what men should never wear on a first date.  Being someone who has trouble securing second dates with people, let alone first dates, I read with interest, wondering if maybe I was subconsciously doing something wrong.

Turns out some of their suggestions I tend to agree with.  Some I'm indifferent on.  Some I outright disagree with.  But, I figure that I'd let YOU be the judge.  Of course, I'm going to pipe in with my own two cents on each of these articles of clothing and whether I agree with the idea of them being worn on a FIRST date...but I'm interested in reading some of your comments, because really, how they came up with this list is something I find entertaining. 

Ready?  Let's go!



1.  Pleated KHAKIS - Apparently the person who wrote the first article said that khakis are okay, if you were going to a junior high school dance, but not for a first date.  I kind of have mixed feelings about this.  If I were to go on a first date, I'd probably end up wearing dark wash jeans without holes or tears in them.  But, that being said, if my khakis were neatly pressed (and did not have pleats in them), I don't see any reason why my date wouldn't like them...of course, I am just a typical man here...what do I know?  I say that they're fine...but again, I prefer flat front.  Pleated makes you look bigger than you really are, and that I know from experience.



2.  JOKE TEES - You know the shirts I'm talking about.  The ones that have cartoon characters on them, or the ones that have swear words on them.  Yeah, I agree that those shirts are probably not a good idea to wear on a first date.  Could you just imagine taking a girl out on a date to a nice restaurant and wearing a T-shirt that says "I'm With Stupid"?  Yeah, there's a deal-breaker there.  Mind you, I happen to own a couple of T-shirts that have cartoon characters on them, but I only ever wear them as sleepwear or loungewear.  Certainly not for a night on the town!  I completely agree.

3.  TOO SHORT PANTS - I just want to say right now that while I agree with this one too (I mean, what guy wants to look like Steve Urkel on a date?), I also want to say that as someone who stands at over six feet tall, finding pants is always a challenge for me.  More often than not, I have to wear pants with a 34-inch inseam, and most stores only seem to carry 32-inch.  Different brands offer different interpretations of what a 32-inch inseam really is, and in some cases, I make it work...but it takes a lot of experiementation.  If ever you see me with too-short pants, it's likely an experiment that didn't quite work.  But, yes, I will reserve my 34-inch inseams for the first date.

4.  TURTLENECKS - I guess they'd work if your first date was at a ski resort, but my personal preference is that I really don't like them strangling my neck.  Definitely not a fan.



5.  TIGHTY-WHITIES - Now, here's one that I question.  I get that to many women, tighty-whities are anything but sexy, but to some guys, they bring comfort and support.  And, I mean, it's underwear.  Whatever you wear underneath your jeans is really up to the wearer's preference.  But, again, these are suggestions for what not to wear on a FIRST DATE.  The chances of having sex on a first date...well, I would think that they'd be pretty darn slim.  And, if that's the case, one could wear tighty-whities, boxer shorts, even go commando, and nobody would care because unless you're totally drunk out of your mind, the chances of a first date ending in a motel room are SLIM at best!  Again, some women may not find it sexy, but it's the FIRST DATE...who's gonna know?
As for what comes between me and my...um...Levis?  That'll have to wait until at least date #2.  ;)



6.  BOW-TIE - If you're best man at a wedding, they can work.  If you're Drew Carey, it can work.  If you're Archie Andrews in the 1950's, it can work.  Personally, I don't like bowties.  Will never wear 'em.

7.  NOVELTY TIES - I'm also the type of guy who hates wearing ties in general...but if I have to wear one, I must agree with this one.  Wearing a Sylvester & Tweety tie to a first date is almost as bad as wearing an "I'm With Stupid" shirt.  Just my opinion though.

8.  TUXEDO - Don't most guys RENT these things?  And, even if you do own one, where would you wear a tuxedo?  Though, I must admit, it'd be pretty hysterical if a guy wore a tuxedo to impress his date and the first date was mini golf.  Mini golf in a tuxedo...yep, there's a YouTube video right there.



9.  TOUPEE - This is news?

10.  MAKE-UP - I guess I'd have to know what their definition of make-up is.  If it were up to me, I'd say things like blemish cream and face moisturizer are acceptable enough, and quite possibly Chapstick, if your lips were dry.  That being said, I don't think women tend to go for guys who wear more make-up than THEY do.  Unless, of course, you're Gene Simmons from KISS...



11.  SELF-TANNER - I'd only recommend this look if you were a cast member of Jersey Shore.  Personally, I'm fine with being pasty white, and I would hope that my date would feel the same way.

12.  SLEEVELESS SHIRTS - I only put this in because I don't know where there would be any sort of instance in which wearing a sleeveless shirt on a first date would be appropriate.  I suppose it may work if you had your first date on a beach...or possibly a gym.  Somehow, I don't think it would be very romantic of a first date to jog on a treadmill while listening to a Sweatin' To The Oldies soundtrack.

13.  VEST - This is one I will fight you on.  I mean it.  My personal style when I'm outside of a work environment is something I like to call economic prep.  In short, I kind of dress like one of those Yuppie type people who can't afford Starbucks.  Would that make me a Guppie?  Who knows?  The point is, I have this really awesome looking argyle vest that looks really great with jeans and a plain T-shirt.  It's also an outfit that I have been complimented on by several people.  Therefore, I completely disagree with the idea of a vest being inappropriate for a first date look, because I've found a way that I can make it work, and still look good. 



14.  SKINNY JEANS - It really all depends on what your definition of skinny jean is.  If your definition of skinny jean is strangling your midsection and losing the feeling in your legs...they're TOO TIGHT.



15.  DIRTY CLOTHES - Unless you got abducted by a garbage truck, or slipped in a mud puddle on your way to pick up your date...this should be common sense!



16.  WIFEBEATERS - Again, a classic tank top style shirt (which is also known as the stupid term wifebeater - seriously, I hate that term) is fine...provided you wear them as underwear like they were meant to be.  I'm pretty sure that if I arrived for a first date just wearing one of these shirts, my date would run the other way!

(For what it is worth, I prefer a V-neck myself.)



17.  COLOGNE - I'm not entirely against cologne or perfume.  A couple of spritzes or dabs are perfectly fine.  Dumping the whole bottle over top of you...yeah, that's never good.



18.  EXCESSIVE BLING - I'm very basic when it comes to jewelry.  I just wear a watch, and that's it.  So, when I see guys that have watches, gold chains, piercings, rings, earrings...I'm tempted to hold up a magnet just to see if they'll stick to it.  That would be entertaining.



19.  PAJAMA PANTS - They're okay if you're sick, recovering from surgery, or if you're sleeping.  Not for a date.

So, there you have it.  Now it's your turn...do you agree?  Disagree?  Have any other suggestions?

Of course, this is all for fun here.  The real lesson is that in my opinion, while I feel it best that you do make a great first impression on a first date, once you meet the one that you love and fall in love with, then it shouldn't matter what you wear or how you look.  As long as she loves you, she'll accept your joke tees, your novelty ties, and your tighty-whities. 

Or at the very least, you can compromise.  :)

Sunday, April 19, 2015

In Defense of Millennials

I'm going to be really honest.  My generation is getting a really bad rap due to the actions of a select few people who happen to be a part of it.

Unfortunately, these people also happen to be some of the loudest and self-absorbed people to ever grace the public eye.

And, well...as much as I hate admitting to partaking in hypocrisy, in this case, I'm going to have to make an exception.  I hate giving these people more publicity but at the same time, I can't help but give examples - just to prove to everybody that not all people who were born in my generation are like this.



The generation, of course, is the Millennial Generation.  And I suppose in some way, I fit the description of a millennial - a person who grew up around technology for most, if not all their life and who values the need for social networking and flexibility in jobs to find what best suits them.  Typically speaking, a Millennial is the son or daughter of parents who were a part of the Baby Boomer generation - or, in my case, parent.  My father was one of the first Baby Boomers, born in 1946.  Mom missed being a Boomer by two months.  Though, given that 2001 seems to be the end date of the Millennial Generation, I suppose some can claim to have parents from Generation X as well.

(Well, technically, I'm kind of on the cusp between Generation X and the Millennial Generation.  Most sources list the end of Generation X as 1980 and the beginning of the Millennial Generation as 1982, meaning that the year I was born (1981) is kind of like that delicious cream filling inside of a generation gap Oreo.)

Anyway, there's been a lot of talk over a couple of separate, but unrelated news stories that despite their differences have one thing in common.  The main subject in both articles are women who are part of the Millennial Generation. 



The first tale we'll talk about is the story of ESPN reporter Britt McHenry (b. May 28, 1986).  Or, I guess I should say "suspended" ESPN reporter.

But what could she have possibly done that could have gotten her suspended from the job she has worked at since the spring of 2014? 

Well, give this video a watch.



Now, I should probably clarify that this video does appear to be edited, as we don't really see any clips of the person behind the service desk of the towing company that this was filmed at.  But either way, the one thing we know is this.  We know that McHenry knew that she was on camera after the attendant pointed it out to her.  After all, we saw the gesture.

And we also know that despite knowing that the camera was on her, she continued to behave in a condescending manner towards the person behind the desk, even going so far as suggesting that her job is something that she should be ashamed of and even takes pot shots at the person's looks.  Again, it would be nice to see the other side of the tape so that we know what could have sparked these comments, but regardless of which, she had absolutely no right to take on an aura of superiority towards someone else who is trying to earn a living.

In fact, watching that video made me cringe.  I can't believe that anyone would act that way and treat someone else with such disgust just based on where they were and who they are.  It's so foul.

Now, to McHenry's credit, she later issued an apology towards the woman at the towing company.  Time will tell whether she has learned anything from this.  I certainly hope she has.

At the very least, I have more faith that she would have learned a lesson from her tantrum than story number two...a story that is more chilling and disgusting than the first.  And surprise, surprise...the star of this tale is a member of the Millennial Generation.

Now, the first thing you need to learn about Kristen Lindsey is that she is a VETERINARIAN.  She is a medical professional whose job includes taking care of sick animals and bringing them back on the road to recovery, or if the animal is too sick, her job is to put them to sleep in a HUMANE manner.  Remember this for later.

The second thing that you need to learn is that Dr. Lindsey has a side hobby of archery.  Or, at least she owns a bow with several arrows.  And that's perfectly fine.  Lots of people practice archery and lots of people do target practice in a safe area to enhance their skills.

And the third thing you need to learn about Dr. Lindsey is that she apparently has no idea how to tell the difference between a feral cat and a domesticated cat.  And that she apparently has keyboard diarrhea.

You see, the good veterinarian decided that she would practice her archery skills on an orange and white cat that she claimed was a feral cat, and when the arrow made contact with the cat, she couldn't resist...ahem...bragging about it.



And no...I will NOT include the image.  It is disgusting and makes me want to vomit.  Actually, the first reaction I had when seeing the photo was pure sadness.

I mean, it would be one thing if the cat was known to be a rabies carrier, or was infested with other incurable diseases.  That would be the only way that this would make a lick of sense whatsoever.  And even so, using a bow and arrow seems to be one of the least humane ways to kill an animal.  Mind you, guns and bear traps are definitely more brutal, but a bow and arrow to kill a cat?  Come on.

And the photo showed her taking pleasure in holding up the arrow with the cat still attached to it with a great big smile on her face and exclaiming that she's the best vet ever.  Oh, yeah...did I mention that she's a VETERINARIAN?!?  How would you feel knowing that your vet that took care of your dog goes around shooting random cats that pass by her yard?  It sort of develops a conflict of interest, doesn't it?  Especially when she takes so much pleasure in bragging about how "the only good feral tomcat is one with an arrow through its head".

The picture was just the disturbing, tainted cherry on top of the ice cream sundae of blood and disgust.

In this case, the vet was let go from her position - despite her claiming that nobody could get rid of her because she was "awesome".

Oh, yeah.  You're "awesome" all right.  And the tragic part?  The cat she murdered wasn't a feral cat at all.  In fact, it could have belonged to a family in Dr. Lindsey's neighbourhood whose cat went missing TWO DAYS BEFORE SHE POSTED THE PICTURE ON FACEBOOK! 

So, why do these two stories rile me up so much (aside from the self-entitlement and psychopathic tendencies that were displayed in each story)?  Well, I found both of these stories on my Facebook News Feed, and sometimes when I see a story that interests me (or in this case, shocks me to the point where I can't believe there are people who really are this vile), I take a look at what some of the comments are underneath.

And well...what made me mad was that some people were commenting that because of these two women, an entire generation of people were rude, crude, sociopathic, idiotic, and not even worth knowing.  They did everything they could do say that the Millennial Generation was the worst generation ever born.



To which I say...hold up.  These two people are NOT a true representation of us.

Believe me, I've heard it all before.  A couple of years ago, I used to belong to a website forum where there was one person who consistently insulted everybody on the board who happened to be born after 1980.  And when I say insulted, I mean they really raked us over the coals and made cruel jokes at our expense.  I took it for a little while, but eventually I had to ignore this person's garbage entirely because I could not stand his negative attitude towards an entire group of people based on the actions of a select few. 

See, I don't take kindly to people who make preconceived judgments on a whole generation of people just because they don't like one or two people within it.  That would be like me declaring that every single man born in 1964 is a serial killer and rapist because Paul Bernardo was born that year.  It sounds absolutely silly when I put it like that, right?

And it sounds really silly to judge the Millennial Generation negatively because of two women who clearly didn't act too swiftly or professionally.  Truth be told, I've known a lot of fellow Millennials who have gone on to do some fantastic things and who have shown that our generation does have a place in the world and is capable of creating some great things to make the world better.  So, stop judging us because of the actions of a couple of people.




And for that person who kept insisting that people born after 1980 were useless and not worth knowing?  Yeah, keep in mind that those people are going to play an integral part in your golden years from filling prescriptions to serving you coffee to even giving you life-saving surgery to keep you alive.

Just think about that the next time you badger and badmouth the youth.  These two women are exceptions, not the norm.  Trust me on this one.