This
is the second of a three part Monday Matinee series.
Last
week, we took a look at the classic 1985 film, “Back to the
Future”. It was a film that made household names of Michael J.
Fox, Christopher Lloyd, and Lea Thompson (although all three were
established stars prior to the making of the film), it was one of the
highest grossing films of the year, and it was probably one of the
films that I remember most from my own childhood.
Well,
in this edition of the blog, we're going to be looking at the second
part of the “Back to the Future” trilogy.
When
we last left off, Marty McFly accidentally traveled back in time from
1985 to 1955, where Marty accidentally set off a chain of events that
could have prevented his parents from even falling in love. In fact,
had Marty not gone out of his way to make everything okay between his
parents, Marty's own mother would have ended up falling in love with
a guy named “Calvin Klein”.
Fortunately,
all was made right in the world, and 1985 was much improved at the
McFly household. But when Doc Brown pays a hasty visit to Marty and
informs him that his children are in peril in the future, it appears
as though Marty will have to go back to the future once more.
Hence
the reason why the movie is named “Back to the Future Part II”,
which began broadcasting in theatres on November 22, 1989. As was
the case with the last film, the film was produced by Steven
Spielberg, directed by Robert Zemeckis, and written by Bob Gale.
At
first, film director Robert Zemeckis was not going to do a sequel to
the wildly successful first film. He thought that the original
ending was funny and humourous enough to not warrant a second
edition. However, the fact that the first film did incredibly well
changed his mind. The only request that he had was that Michael J.
Fox and Christopher Lloyd would at the very least come back to
reprise their roles. Christopher Lloyd immediately agreed to come
back as Doc Brown, and since “Family Ties” wrapped up production
in 1989 (the same year as the film's release), Michael J. Fox was
free to honour his commitment to the movie.
Other
actors and actresses returning to the film was Lea Thompson (Lorraine
McFly), and Thomas F. Wilson (Biff Tannen).
There
were however a couple of recasts that had to be made. For starters,
Marty's girlfriend Jennifer was played by Elisabeth Shue. For what
it was worth, Claudia Wells was asked to come back to the role she
originated, but she was unable to make the commitment due to some
personal issues. This actually lead to one scene from the 1985
version being completely re-shot for inclusion in the 1989 film!
And,
then there's the Crispin Glover story.
You
might recall that back in 1985, Crispin Glover played the role of
Marty's father, George McFly. Glover was in talks with producers to
reprise his role for the sequel, but the only sticky point of the
deal was the issue of salary. Crispin Glover made the claim that the
highest offer that he was given by the producers was $125,000. A
modest sum by anyone's perspective for a job...but when you consider
that the other actors and actresses were making at least twice the
amount for the same job, I suppose it could be understood as to why
Glover turned it down. The producers scrambled to try and find a way
to keep George McFly in the production, and they settled on using old
footage of Glover from the first film, and editing it together with
new footage shot by replacement actor Jeffrey Weissman. To hide the
fact that the actor was a replacement, prosthetics and clever camera
angles were used. But this only served to tick Crispin Glover off
even more. Glover even launched a lawsuit against the producers of
“Back to the Future: Part II” because he did not give them
permission to use his likeness in the film after he turned the
project down.
For
what it's worth though, Glover's lawsuit did cause the Screen Actors
Guild to revise several clauses in their policies which have
prevented a situation like Glover's from happening again.
Okay,
so now that we've gotten the controversy out of the way, why don't we
continue the story from where we left off, shall we?
Although
the film was made in 1989, the present day that the second film is
set in is still 1985. October 26, 1985, to be exact.
It
is on this date that the ending of the first film takes place...where
Doc Brown arrives at the McFly household and tells Marty and Jennifer
that they have to take a trip to the future so that they can prevent
their children from getting into serious trouble. Marty understands
completely what Doc is saying, but Jennifer has the “what are you
talking about” look down pat. Regardless, Doc, Marty, and Jennifer
hop in the DeLorean time machine and arrive in the year
2015...unaware that Biff Tannen has witnessed the whole thing.
Now,
Doc realizes that Jennifer might not react too well to the idea of
going ahead in time thirty years, so he hypnotizes her and leaves her
in a temporary catatonic state in an alleyway while Doc and Marty go
forward with their plan to save Marty's future child, Marty McFly Jr.
To do this, Marty swaps places with Marty Jr. (as they both looked
exactly the same), in hopes of refusing an offer to cause mischief
with Biff's grandson, Griff Tannen (also played by Wilson). Marty
successfully does this, but it causes Griff to get into a fight with
him. Of course, this ends up being a futile attempt, as Griff and
his buddies find themselves getting arrested.
And,
that's the end. Happy ending for everyone.
But,
WAIT! There's more.
Have
you ever had the wish that you wanted to go forward in time a week,
take a look at the newspaper listings for winning lottery numbers,
record them, go back in time, purchase a ticket for the week ahead,
and become an instant millionaire? On the surface, it sounds like an
ingenious idea...but remember, changing an event in the future could
affect the past (either positively or negatively).
So
when Marty purchases a sports almanac in 2015 Hill Valley, which has
a complete guide to every sporting event between 1950-2000 (including
final scores in games), Doc warns him of that very thing...how
profiting from time travel could have negative benefits. But before
Doc and Marty could dispose of the almanac, the police have picked up
Jennifer, and are now taking her to the future McFly household,
leaving Doc and Marty to try and rescue her.
Of
course, this leads to a pivotal plot development in which Jennifer
hides in the McFly household while she witnesses the surreal sight of
her future family sharing dinner. A lot of information is doled out
at this family dinner, in which it is revealed that future Marty was
involved in a car wreck, and that Marty has lost his job thanks to
him entering a shady business deal with his co-worker Needles (played
by Flea of the Red Hot Chili Peppers). There are several faxes
located in the McFly household, and Jennifer grabs one and sticks it
in her pocket. But the adventure ends when young Jennifer bumps into
old Jennifer, and the two faint. This sets the stage for Doc and
Marty to rescue Jennifer and go back in time to 1985.
What
they don't realize was that 2015 Biff followed Marty and Doc,
pilfered the 2015 almanac, took the DeLorean back to 1955 Hill
Valley, gave teenage Biff the almanac telling him to bet on every
game that was recorded in the book, and used the DeLorean to go back
to the future before Marty, Doc, and Jennifer discovered that
anything was wrong.
As
a result of this, the 1985 Hill Valley is drastically changed, with
Biff being the supreme ruler of the community and the rest of the
city in ruins. And, as far as the McFly household goes, his father
meets his tragic fate, and his mother ends up married to her worst
nightmare!
So,
this means that Marty has to go back in time again to 1955, and
prevent 2015 Biff from giving 1955 Biff the almanac...without undoing
everything that he accomplished in the first film.
Confused
yet? Well, here's one more thing to ponder. You know that fax that
Jennifer pilfered in 2015 Hill Valley? It plays an important part in
the movie we'll be discussing for next week's Monday Matinee.
For
now, I thought that it would be fun to take a look at some of the
predictions that “Back to the Future: Part II” made, and see how
many of them actually came true. I know that 2015 won't be here for
a couple of years yet, but since we're so close, we might as well
have a look at what the film got right, and what the film got wrong.
Things the film got right will be highlighted in green, and things
that the film got wrong will be written in red.
WATCHING
SIX TELEVISION SHOWS AT ONCE
Okay,
let's face it. In 1989, we were not that skilled with multi-tasking,
and back in those days, we could only watch one show at once. But in
2015 Hill Valley, Marty could watch six shows on the same screen. In
the real world 2013, thanks to the addition of picture-in-picture
technology, as well as DirecTV implementing the technology for people
to watch eight football games at once, it's safe to say that this
prediction is one that came true.
HOVERBOARDS
In
1989, we had skateboards. In 2015, they supposedly had hoverboards,
a skateboard that you could ride through the air. As of May 2013, we
still don't have hoverboards. We do have segways though. Those
things are kind of cool.
PEPSI
MAX
If
you were to go into the 80s cafe that has opened up in 2015 Hill
Valley, you'd see 80s artifacts on display, 80s games in the arcades,
and four flavours of Pepsi. You'd have regular Pepsi, Diet Pepsi,
Pepsi Max, and Pepsi Perfect. Well, we don't quite have Pepsi
Perfect just yet, but Pepsi Max (which is sort of similar to Coke
Zero is that it claims to have zero calories, but all the same taste
as a regular Pepsi) has been a regular fixture in North America since
2008/2009. So, that prediction came true.
Though
there's a part of me that kind of hopes that the 2015 Pepsi logo will
actually look like the ones that were shown in the film. No offense
to Pepsi, but your current logo is kind of ugly.
QUEEN
DIANA
This
is one that you have to freeze-frame to get. When Marty is looking
at a newspaper from 2015 Hill Valley, it makes reference to Queen
Diana. Sadly, there's a couple of reasons why this prediction
obviously won't come true.
Firstly,
Diana was killed on August 31, 1997 following a chase in a Parisian
tunnel. So, there was no way that she would have been queen. But
even if Diana had lived, chances are that Queen Elizabeth will still
be queen in 2015. She's still Queen now in 2013. And, this isn't
even taking into account that Charles and Diana officially divorced
six years after “Back to the Future: Part II” was released.
VIDEO
CONFERENCING
I
imagine that in 1989, there weren't a lot of people thinking that we
would be able to sit down and chat with someone via a video screen.
And, well, now we have Skype, YouTube, and all sorts of other
Internet sites which allow us to stay connected through video. How's
that for a prediction come true?
LASERDISCS
Hey,
remember when laserdiscs first came out in the late 1980s, and how
they resembled gigantic CD's, and how they were going to be the
biggest thing since the invention of the VCR? Yeah, me either.
These days, I'm not even sure that one could find a laserdisc player,
let alone a laserdisc. I vaguely remember my elementary school
having one back in the early 1990s, and that was probably the only
time I remember seeing one. As we well know by now, in 2013, the DVD
and Blu-Ray disc has effectively killed the VHS tape (and the
laserdisc). And, I would think that by 2015, Netflix and TiVo may
send the DVD to its inevitable doom. So, the fact that so many
laserdiscs appear in Hill Valley 2015 seems a bit fishy.
Those
are just a few of the predictions that “Back to the Future: Part
II” made. Seriously, just watch the first half of “Back to the
Future: Part II” and make note of everything that was shown. You
may be surprised at how many predictions they got right!
Coming
up next week, the conclusion of the Back to the Future series.
I actually still have a functional laserdisc player in my home entertainment system and I still watch all of the Back to the Future films on it. The first one is in fullscreen format, but 2 and 3 are in widescreen.
ReplyDelete