You know, it's not very
often that I do a Monday Matinee feature on a made-for-television
movie, but given the recent buzz over a film that aired on television
just last month, I thought that I would make an exception.
Before I get into the
discussion, I thought that I would offer up a little confession. The
only reason why I am just now getting to this film for discussion is
because I only managed to watch the film for the first time just a
couple of days ago on Canada's version of the Discovery Channel. I
didn't want to do a Monday Matinee on a film that I have never seen.
I wouldn't have much to talk about if I hadn't.
So, that's why I'm coming
a little bit late to the party. I hope that you all understand.
And now, on with the
discussion.
There are a few reasons
why whenever I talk about films in the Monday Matinee that I don't
typically choose movies that were made for a television audience
(with lone exception to the 1994 miniseries “The Stand”, which
was absolutely brilliant).
The first reason is that
nobody really remembers them after they air. Most people can quote
at least one or two quotes from “Star Wars”, “Harry Potter”,
or “Borat”, but I bet you that nobody remembers the movie which
had Kellie Martin from “Life Goes On” stabbing Tori Spelling to
death with a knife. I don't even remember the title. Though
admittedly, I imagine some tuned in to watch Donna Martin –
exsanguinate.
(Yeah, yeah...bad joke. I
know. For the record, the TV movie was 1994's “A Friend To Die
For”.)
The second reason is that
most of these television movies are unnecessarily saccharinely sweet.
I get that Hallmark has made a fortune with nice, warm, and fuzzy
messages printed inside of each greeting card they manufacture. But
there's a reason for that. A greeting card is only like thirty
seconds of entertainment. Now, if you took that same sentiment and
expanded it into a two hour movie, it would be so much sweetness that
you'd probably throw up a rainbow of Skittles. I have nothing
against Hallmark films, but I can't sit through one without resisting
the urge to change the channel.
And, lastly, made for
television movies are churned out faster than episodes of MTV's “The
Real World”, and none of them have really stood out as being epic,
memorable, and noteworthy enough to devote an entire blog to them...
...until now.
The film up for discussion
today aired on the Syfy Channel on July 11, 2013, and as of August
2013 has an unusually high ranking on the film review website “Rotten
Tomatoes” (last I checked, it was just under 90% in its approval
rating). Mind you, I would imagine that a lot of those rankings were
either punched in by die-hard fans, people under the influence of
something, or people who love a movie no matter how ridiculous it is.
And believe me, the
premise for this film is quite ridiculous. In fact, I think it can
be summarized in just one word.
SHARKNADO!!!
Yes,
believe it or not, I'm doing a blog entry on what appears to be the
hottest trend for Summer 2013. “Sharknado”.
And,
I think we can figure out what the movie is about just based on the
two words that make up this...rather awkward looking portmanteau.
Shark
(n) – a giant fish species with sharp teeth, classified to be at
the highest order of the underwater food chain
Tornado
(n) – a rotating cloud of air that is in contact with the ground
and a cumulonimbus cloud that is capable of destroying entire
structures depending on its speed
You
put them together, and you have this.
Sharknado
(n) – a rotating cloud of air that is capable of raining sharks
down upon the earth
Now,
I don't know exactly if there has ever been any instance of a
“sharknado” ever being recorded in the modern history books. I'm
going to wager a guess that a sharknado has never ever happened
before, but then again, I've only been alive thirty-two years. For
all I know, we could have had one back in 707 BC and not even
realized it because none of us were around.
But,
just for the sake of argument, let's just state that sharknadoes are
extremely rare. We've never actually seen one happen, but the
possibility I suppose is always there. Like maybe a 0.0000000000001%
chance.
Anyway,
that's the basic plot of “Sharknado”. A hurricane appears in the
middle of the Pacific Ocean just outside of Los Angeles, California,
and the result sends thousands of killer sharks up in the air to
swirl around a funnel cloud that is fast approaching the city. And
this is a really bad thing to happen. Los Angeles is after all one
of the most populated cities in the United States, and if sharks
began to fall down on Sunset Boulevard, Rodeo Drive, and the
Hollywood Walk of Fame, it wouldn't be great for tourism. And, most
certainly, everyone in the city would become lunch for these
displaced sharks.
But
that's okay! We have a team of heroes made up of former 1990s stars!
With Ian Ziering from “Beverly Hills 90210”, Tara Reid from
“American Pie”, the dad from “Home Alone” (John Heard) and
Jaason Simmons from “Baywatch” on our side, we have no reason to
worry, right?
Right?
Well,
okay...I suppose it could be worse. We could have had Tori Spelling
and Kellie Martin. Hey, maybe Tori Spelling could have stabbed
Kellie Martin with the tooth of a Great White Shark as payback for
what Kellie did to her in that 1994 movie!
Anyway,
“Sharknado” is definitely a movie that is filled with action.
See a guy get his arm lopped off by a shark, bleeding to death right
on the pavement! See the iconic ferris wheel located on the Santa
Monica Pier roll away and smash into a building! See a shark swallow
someone whole after they fall out of a helicopter already in motion!
And
see marine biologists, meteorologists, and scientists all over the
world writhing around the floor in uncontrollable fits of laughter
over how ridiculous and inaccurate the film is!
To
be honest with you, I'm not exactly the kind of guy who likes seeing
films with excessive blood and gore, and I usually turn away my head
every time I see it happen (one of the many reasons why I want a
career in writing and not in medicine). But the ways in which people
were killed off on “Sharknado” were so ridiculous and
unbelievable that I didn't get the slightest bit nauseous. I laughed
my head off at the scenes which were supposed to be serious, but
executed as anything but!
I'm
specifically singling out the last twenty minutes of the film as
being one of those moments that was like a really horrible
twenty-seven car pileup on the middle of a major highway. It's
incredibly bad, horrific, and vomit-inducing, but for some insane
reason, you have a very difficult time not staring at it like a deer
in the headlights.
That
essentially summarizes my entire “Sharknado” viewing experience.
A movie that is absolutely bad in every possible way, but invoked
such a fan reaction that it became an instant hit all over the world.
I mean, Mia Farrow tweeted about the movie on her own account. She
was all like “OMG Sharknado!!!” She was completely fan-girling
this movie, keeping in mind that she was in “Rosemary's Baby” and
several other high profile pictures over her career. So, I suppose
if Mia Farrow liked it, then it had to have some impact, right?
At
any rate, my final impression of “Sharknado” is as such. It's a
movie that has so many plot holes, it's like the film version of
swiss cheese. The acting skills are...well...laughably bad. And,
the likelihood of sharks raining down over the California coast is
well...slim to impossible. At the same time though, I do like the
fact that the filmmakers have made the film knowing that we weren't
going to take it seriously. They were having fun with the crazy
plot, and took chances on scenes for the film. Some actually didn't
turn out too bad, while others were laughably horrible. But, you
know you have to admire the fact that they took a risk, and judging
by the fact that people are still talking about “Sharknado” a
month later, it seemed that they accomplished what they set out to
do.
And
Ian Ziering is probably enjoying his new-found popularity. Why, I
don't think he's had this much media coverage since “Beverly Hills
90210” wrapped up in 2000. It doesn't even matter whether his
acting will win him a People's Choice Award (not likely), or a Golden
Raspberry Award (now we're talking). His name is out there again,
and that likely makes him very happy.
All
in all, “Sharknado” might not meet the definition of being a film
classic that people will remember twenty or thirty years down the
road...but as a summer film that serves as a nice distraction from
everyday life? It works.
No comments:
Post a Comment