Hello,
everyone! Are you ready to kick off another week?
I
know, I know...some of you already have the Monday doldrums. I know
what you're saying. Some of you hate Mondays so much that you
actually make Garfield the cat look pleasant.
To
be truthful, I don't mind Mondays all that much. Although my
schedule at the job that I actually make money with can be kind of
unpredictable at times, I can always count on the fact that I have
almost every single Monday off (unless I have Sunday off, in which
case I usually have to come in...as such the case today. But, I'm
rambling, never mind).
And,
besides...Mondays are lots of fun in this blog because we get to
examine a movie in greater detail.
Now,
because we're smack dab in the middle of “Black History Month”,
today's movie is going to be linked with the theme of the month.
And, although the movie that I have chosen has a predominantly
Caucasian cast, it does feature a storyline that was deemed extremely
controversial for its time.
These
days, when one mentions the words “interracial relationship”, I
would think that most of us would not think that it is a big deal. I
am one of those people who does not select a mate based on skin
colour, hair colour, eye colour, or clothing colour. When it comes
to dating, I would date anybody who was interested in me regardless
of what their background is. But five decades earlier, would you
believe that interracial dating was so frowned upon that in 1967, it
was still considered an illegal act in seventeen states? Well, at
least until Loving vs. Virginia
invalidated those laws in June 1967.
You
know, being born in the early 1980s, I sometimes have no idea just
how much racism existed back in the childhoods of my parents and
grandparents. In many ways, I would have loved to have gone back in
time to experience things for the first time...and then there are
times in which I don't want to revisit the past because for some
people, it was a living hell because of the skin colour they were
born with.
But
sometimes it's good to look back on the bad and the ugly within our
history books so that we can appreciate the good moments even more.
And,
today's film takes a look at what happens when a woman gets involved
in a relationship with someone of a different racial background, as
well as the frustrations that can come from having family members who
vehemently oppose the union.
Today's
film study is the 1967 film “Guess Who's Coming To Dinner?”. The
film starred Sidney Poitier, Katharine Hepburn, and in his final film
appearance before his death, Spencer Tracy.
Directed
by Stanley Kramer and written by William Rose, the film debuted on
December 12, 1967...six months after Tracy passed away of a heart
attack in June 1967 at the age of 67. This movie was not the first
time that Tracy and Hepburn had worked together...this was actually
their ninth and final movie together. It was a film that Katharine
Hepburn was never able to see after it was completed due to the
painful memories that were associated with the making of the movie.
When Hepburn herself passed away in 2003 at the age of 96, at last
report, she still had not seen it. And, I'll get into why that was
the case further down in the blog entry.
I'll
just go into the basic plot of the movie very quickly, mainly because
I don't want to give too much away. The story begins as we are
introduced to a woman by the name of Joanna “Joey” Drayton (who
was played by the niece of Katharine Hepburn, Katharine Houghton).
Joey is young, beautiful, smart, and very Caucasian. And, while she
was on a vacation in Hawaii, she gets involved in a whirlwind romance
with Dr. John Prentice (Poitier), who is intelligent, skilled,
idealistic, financially stable, and very African-American.
But
Joey seems to believe that this won't matter to her parents. She was
raised in a very liberal household by her parents Matt and Christina
(Tracy and Hepburn). Matt is a newspaper publisher, and Christina
runs a small art gallery in San Francisco, California, and Joey grew
up in an upper class environment. Why, surely the colour of Dr.
Prentice's skin wouldn't make a difference. He was young,
successful, and a doctor! What parent wouldn't like that in a
prospective son-in-law?
Well,
apparently Matt and Christina don't.
Despite
Joey's best intentions, and despite her arguments that John is the
perfect man for her, Matt and Christina don't seem convinced. And,
this is quite surprising when we discover that Joey was raised in an
environment where she was encouraged to treat black people and people
of other races as equals.
It
basically comes across as this. They're fine with being kind and
nice to people of a different race, but when the possibility of one
of them getting engaged to their only daughter arises, they are
suddenly opposed to it. Seems a slight bit hypocritical, doesn't it?
And,
lest you think that Joey's parents are the only set of parents
uncomfortable with the arrangement, there is another surprise.
John's parents (Roy E. Glenn and Bea Richards) are also invited to
dinner at the Drayton household, and they were going to San Francisco
without any knowledge that Joey is white...and once they find out,
they act no better than the Draytons! Only a friend of Matt's,
Monsignor Ryan (Cecil Kellaway) acts as the voice of reason between
the two feuding families.
So,
will Johnny and Joey march down the aisle and become husband and wife
or not? Well, that's not for me to answer. As I do with every
Monday Matinee entry, I encourage all of you to watch the film for
yourselves. It really is a fantastic film to watch. Very insightful
and a perfect film to showcase this month for sure.
Now,
here's the bits that happened behind the scenes that you didn't know.
01
– The screenplay for the film was written in just five weeks.
02
– When it came time to cast the actors for the film, it was
reported that several of the actors committed to the project before
seeing the script because they believed so strongly in the message
that the film set out to give.
03
– Spencer Tracy was in very poor health while he was filming “Guess
Who's Coming To Dinner?”...in fact, his health was so poor that
insurance companies refused to cover him. The problem was solved by
having both Tracy and Hepburn put their salaries into escrow. If
Tracy passed away during filming, it could be completed with a
different actor.
04
– Because of Tracy's health, he was unable to put in a full day of
work. He only worked for two or three hours at a time before noon in
order to give him time to rest in between work days. In some cases,
stand-ins were brought in to substitute for Tracy when other
characters had close-ups with him in the scene.
05
– Spencer Tracy completed his last scene on May 26, 1967. He
passed away June 10, 1967. The film was released December 1967. Now
you have a bit of understanding as to why Hepburn had a difficult
time watching the whole movie in full.
06
– Sidney Poitier was so star-struck by Spencer Tracy and Katharine
Hepburn that he had difficulty saying his lines. The problem was
solved in a rather ingenious way. Poitier recited his lines in front
of a couple of empty chairs, with producers reading out the lines
spoken by Tracy and Hepburn to Poitier off-camera. The scenes were
then spliced together in editing.
07
– In the scene where Sidney Poitier is on the telephone, a bust of
Spencer Tracy sculpted by Katharine Hepburn is substituting for Tracy
himself!
08
– It took twenty years for the film to be released on home video,
finally coming out on VHS December 12, 1987.
09
– Does the maid in the movie look familiar? She should. She was
played by Isabel Sanford...otherwise known as Weezie Jefferson from
“The Jeffersons”.
10
– Stanley Kramer directed the made-for-television remake of this
movie in 1975.
11
– The verdict for “Loving vs. Virginia” was made on June 12,
1967...two days after Spencer Tracy passed away. This decision also
made a film line spoken by Roy Glenn to Sidney Poitier erroneous (the
line about breaking the law in sixteen or seventeen states).
12
– Look closely at the glasses that Spencer Tracy wore in the movie.
Notice that they have no glare? That's because the glasses did not
have lenses.
13
– There was originally a reference to Martin Luther King Jr.
included in the film when it was first released. After his 1968
assassination, cinemas all over the United States edited the line out
of the film. It has since been restored in home video releases.
14
– Katharine Hepburn won an Academy Award for her performance in
“Guess Who's Coming To Dinner?”, and Spencer Tracy received a
posthumous nomination.
15
– When Spencer Tracy gives his memorable soliloquy in the film,
look closely at Katharine Hepburn. Those tears she was crying were
real.
16
– Though Katharine Houghton made her film debut in this movie,
other people that were considered for the role of Joey were Mariette
Hartley and Samantha Eggar.
Hi. I justed rewatched GWCTD last night and wanted to google to see why there weren't any lens in Tracy's eyeglasses since they made such a big deal of his character's wearing them, and because by then they were using lens in glasses in the movies and stumbled onto your post. I am a movie fanatic --TCM is my 'default' station -- going to the movie festival is on my bucket list -- so I knew most of what you've written here, but it was great to meet a fellow movie lover......enjoy the movies.......
ReplyDeleteSo why WERE there no lenses! Tell us!
Delete